2018
DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Exciting Point Processes with Spatial Covariates: Modelling the Dynamics of Crime

Abstract: Summary Crime has both varying patterns in space, related to features of the environment, economy and policing, and patterns in time arising from criminal behaviour, such as retaliation. Serious crimes may also be presaged by minor crimes of disorder. We demonstrate that these spatial and temporal patterns are generally confounded, requiring analyses to take both into account, and propose a spatiotemporal self‐exciting point process model that incorporates spatial features, near repeat and retaliation effects,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…'predictive policing' (Perry et al 2013). Reinhart and Greenhouse (2018) classify the methods most often used as belonging to one of three classes: (i) hot spot maps, (ii) near repeat analysis, (iii) regression-based methods.…”
Section: The Practice Of Predicting Crimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…'predictive policing' (Perry et al 2013). Reinhart and Greenhouse (2018) classify the methods most often used as belonging to one of three classes: (i) hot spot maps, (ii) near repeat analysis, (iii) regression-based methods.…”
Section: The Practice Of Predicting Crimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the large sample sizes, tests of crime reductions tended to only show a statistically significant crime reduction effect by a small margin. One potential way to account for this in future research is to estimate the decay effect directly, such as by decomposing the offspring effect in a Hawkes model into two components, crimes with and without arrests (Achab et al, 2018;Mohler, Carter, & Raje, 2018;Reinhart & Greenhouse, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing with the results of the analysis of the burglary crimes in Los Angeles during the period of Mohler et al (2011), the clustering effect in the robbery violence data seems much lower. In Reinhart and Greenhouse (2018), the proportion of clustering events in all the burglary crimes in Pittsburgh during 2011-2016 amounts to 47%. The reason might be that the same burglar watches and visits several neighbouring houses within a short timespan, whereas a robber always escapes from the crime spot quickly to avoid being caught.…”
Section: Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adopting the formulation of the Hawkes process, the model of Mohler and co-workers incorporates the time varying hotspots and near repeats with the assumption that every crime induces a locally higher risk of crime which decays in space and time. Reinhart and Greenhouse (2018) considered a background with simple spatial covariates. Since parametric models are difficult to construct for data where empirical studies are insufficient, non-parametric and semiparametric estimation methods for the Hawkes model have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%