2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-022-07973-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of selected small specimen test techniques for identifying deformation and failure properties of metallic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 251 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the results presented in Tables 1-8 indicates differences in the tensile properties of sub-sized specimens compared to standard specimens. In general, small specimens can retain the same mechanical characteristics as conventional specimens if there are similarities in the geometry and dimensions of structural elements (grains, grain boundaries, second phase, inclusions), deformation mode and stress state during loading, specimen geometry, test fixtures, and clamps [55].…”
Section: Sub-sized Test Specimens With 3 MM Gauge Diametermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of the results presented in Tables 1-8 indicates differences in the tensile properties of sub-sized specimens compared to standard specimens. In general, small specimens can retain the same mechanical characteristics as conventional specimens if there are similarities in the geometry and dimensions of structural elements (grains, grain boundaries, second phase, inclusions), deformation mode and stress state during loading, specimen geometry, test fixtures, and clamps [55].…”
Section: Sub-sized Test Specimens With 3 MM Gauge Diametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies focused on developing small specimen test techniques (SSTTs) [53,54] that are not limited only to AMed materials to reduce the material and time consumption as much as possible. The SSTs can achieve good consistency with the conventional test and are divided into three categories: similarity (small tensile test-STT and small compression test-SCT), penetration (small punch beam test-SPT and small shear), and semi-penetration (indentation test-IT) [55]. According to Karthik et al [56], the miniature specimen mechanical testing technology was first used for the material testing of nuclear and non-nuclear industries, the welding industry, and micro-and nanodevices and is defined as a method used to assess the mechanical behaviour of materials using specimens that are considerably smaller than the standard specimen size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) research and development of new materials, e.g., mechanical properties of nanomaterials, composites and precious metals; (iii) local-region mechanical properties analysis and damage behavior prediction of heterogeneous structures, e.g., heat-affected zones in weld joints and single-phase properties of multi-phase structures in steels; (iv) mesoand micro-scale mechanical behaviors, e.g., gradient materials, thin-film materials, biological materials, and microscopic devices. The schematic geometries of various small-sized specimens are shown from macro-to nano-scales in Figure 2 [25].…”
Section: Application Of Small-size Sample Tensile Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the ratio of thickness to the grain size of flat samples should not be less than 5-10 [29]. The minimum sizes of thickness and gauge length were recommended as 0.2 mm and 2 mm, respectively [25,30]. Small-sized specimens with different parallel lengths are shown in Figure 3, and they cover almost all possible options for the reduced aspect ratio (1:1 to 5:1) [31].…”
Section: Application Of Small-size Sample Tensile Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-throughput testing is employed in materials research for screening a high number of experimental conditions, which involves minimal sample preparation, reduced sample volumes, high automatization, parallelization of measurements, and miniature specimens [1]. Regarding miniaturized techniques, several have been reported for mechanical property characterization [2,3], though not all of them are standardized. This lack of standardization causes difficulties when comparing and interpreting the results in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%