2002
DOI: 10.1002/pse.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of seismic hazard description in US design codes and procedures

Abstract: A review of seismic hazard description in United States design codes and procedures is presented in this paper. This review includes: history of seismic hazard maps; development and use of seismic hazard maps; and use and adoption of seismic building codes in the US. The review includes discussion of two paradigm shifts. The first paradigm shift occurred in the 1970s when seismic hazard was described as contour maps of probabilities of peak ground accelerations being exceeded. The second paradigm shift occurre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably the first documented account of adopting engineered structural measures in buildings to withstand the forces generated by earthquakes was in Japan in 1895 [93], while earlier seismic design codes date back to 1927 in USA [94] and in early 1930s in Chile [95] and India/Pakistan [96]. Ever since these early efforts, the field of earthquake resistant design has advanced to the use of various forms of traditional seismic lateral force resistance systems such as ductile moment frames, braced frames, and shear walls, as well as the use of base-isolation, supplemental damping devices, and active control of lateral forces induced by an earthquake in a variety of structures ranging from residential houses to skyscrapers to bridges and nuclear power plants [97].…”
Section: (I) Geophysical Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably the first documented account of adopting engineered structural measures in buildings to withstand the forces generated by earthquakes was in Japan in 1895 [93], while earlier seismic design codes date back to 1927 in USA [94] and in early 1930s in Chile [95] and India/Pakistan [96]. Ever since these early efforts, the field of earthquake resistant design has advanced to the use of various forms of traditional seismic lateral force resistance systems such as ductile moment frames, braced frames, and shear walls, as well as the use of base-isolation, supplemental damping devices, and active control of lateral forces induced by an earthquake in a variety of structures ranging from residential houses to skyscrapers to bridges and nuclear power plants [97].…”
Section: (I) Geophysical Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, this trend does not continue indefinitely and is limited by the maximum magnitude. Another important consideration in recurrence modelling is ascertaining the maximum credible earthquake (MCE) magnitude which is dependent on the size of the potential seismic sources7,28,29,30.…”
Section: Seismic Activity Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical models have been developed to model a combination of wave modification mechanisms56–60. Alternatively, simple manual methods, such as the Code response spectrum models, may be used for general seismic hazard analyses1–6,1–62. Such code models have been developed from statistical analyses of large volumes of empirical data63–65.…”
Section: Site Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their use has been growing over the past few decades thanks to the increasing interest in geotechnical earthquake engineering, and particularly in shear wave velocity (V s ) measurements (e.g. Beavers, 2002;Chaillat et al, 2009;Foti et al, 2015;. This is a consequence of the introduction of a number of anti-seismic building codes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%