2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of safety-focused mechanical modeling of commercial lithium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
149
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5,6] In fact, the electrolyte salt used in commercial LIBs, lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF 6 ), demonstrates thermal decomposition at above 60 °C and reaction with water (even when the content of H 2 O is only above 10 ppm). This is due to the transference number of PF 6 − being higher than that of Li + , which ultimately limits power delivery and favor lithium metal dendritic growth, this latter leading to severe safety issues. Although a few other lithium salts (e.g., lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF 4 ), [8] lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB), [9] and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (LiTFSI) [10,11] ) have been widely investigated, none of them has been demonstrated as a viable replacement to LiPF 6 , yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,6] In fact, the electrolyte salt used in commercial LIBs, lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF 6 ), demonstrates thermal decomposition at above 60 °C and reaction with water (even when the content of H 2 O is only above 10 ppm). This is due to the transference number of PF 6 − being higher than that of Li + , which ultimately limits power delivery and favor lithium metal dendritic growth, this latter leading to severe safety issues. Although a few other lithium salts (e.g., lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF 4 ), [8] lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB), [9] and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (LiTFSI) [10,11] ) have been widely investigated, none of them has been demonstrated as a viable replacement to LiPF 6 , yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These electrolytes also tend to react with active materials causing capacity loss [1,8,9] and have a transference number between 0.2 and 0.5. [14][15][16] To address these issues, solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) such as ion-conducting inorganic ceramics, [17,18] organic polymers, [4,19] and ceramic-composites [5,20,21] have been investigated as alternatives to liquid electrolytes. [14][15][16] To address these issues, solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) such as ion-conducting inorganic ceramics, [17,18] organic polymers, [4,19] and ceramic-composites [5,20,21] have been investigated as alternatives to liquid electrolytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical applications, there are three typical abuse conditions that can cause the failure of a LIB, including mechanical damage (crushing, collision, nail penetration, etc. ), thermal abuse (heating), and electrical abuse (overcharge/discharge and short‐circuits) . Usually, these types of abuse behavior occur together.…”
Section: Conventional Solutions For Lib Safety Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%