2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-021-00484-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of public health, social and ethical implications of voluntary medical male circumcision programs for HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract: Ideally, the benefits of public health interventions should outweigh any associated harms, burdens, and adverse unintended consequences. The intended benefit of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) programs in eastern and southern Africa (ESA) is the reduction of HIV infections. We review the literature for evidence of reductions in HIV incidence, evaluate the extent to which decreases in HIV incidence can be reasonably attributed to VMMC programs, and summarize social harms and ethical concerns associat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a justification rests on the assumption that these potential future health benefits will in some way "outweigh" the harms of the procedure, whether intrinsic (e.g., pain, damage to or loss of sensitive, prima facie valuable genital tissue [84][85][86]), or accidental (e.g., possible surgical complications, negative psychosexual sequalae) [87][88][89][90]. Whether this is a reasonable assumption, at least for penile circumcision, is debated by several authors in this issue [91][92][93][94][95], while an analogous debate on the potential benefits and harms of intersex surgeries can be found in Part 1.…”
Section: Two Types Of Female Genital Modification-or Two Perceivedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a justification rests on the assumption that these potential future health benefits will in some way "outweigh" the harms of the procedure, whether intrinsic (e.g., pain, damage to or loss of sensitive, prima facie valuable genital tissue [84][85][86]), or accidental (e.g., possible surgical complications, negative psychosexual sequalae) [87][88][89][90]. Whether this is a reasonable assumption, at least for penile circumcision, is debated by several authors in this issue [91][92][93][94][95], while an analogous debate on the potential benefits and harms of intersex surgeries can be found in Part 1.…”
Section: Two Types Of Female Genital Modification-or Two Perceivedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate sterilization practices due to limited resources contribute significantly to post-operative infections. 19 Moreover, a shortage of skilled healthcare providers exacerbates these issues as they may lack sufficient training and experience necessary for safe circumcisions. 20 Furthermore, there are notable gaps in research on male circumcision specifically conducted within Ghana's context.…”
Section: High Prevalence Of Complications In Male Circumcisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marge Berer, the founding editor of Reproductive Health Matters, has raised numerous concerns about the failure to account for this trial, which she suggests puts African women at risk who are already more vulnerable to HIV and AIDS (Berer, 2007(Berer, , 2008(Berer, , 2009. Additional gender-related, ethical, and public health concerns about the WHO campaign to circumcise millions of African boys and men have been raised by others (Rudrum et al, 2017;Gilbertson et al, 2019;Luseno et al, 2019Luseno et al, , 2021Rudrum, 2020;Fish et al, 2021;Rennie et al, 2021).…”
Section: Justifying Inconsistenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data regarding HIV-related health benefits for MGC come from studies of adult men in sub-Saharan Africa who, ostensibly, gave their free and informed consent to undergo penile circumcision, hoping this would reduce their risk of acquiring HIV. The population-level effectiveness of such circumcision as a form of prophylaxis against HIV remains contested (Garenne et al, 2013;Rosenberg et al, 2018;Garenne and Matthews, 2019;Loevinsohn et al, 2020;Luseno et al, 2021;Garenne, 2022), perhaps because one's risk of contracting a sexually transmitted virus has more to do with behavioral and social-structural considerations than with anatomical factors such as the presence or absence of healthy genital tissues (Aggleton, 2007;Norton, 2013Norton, , 2017Parker et al, 2015;Earp and Darby, 2019;Fish et al, 2021).…”
Section: Justifying Inconsistenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%