2020
DOI: 10.1115/1.4047776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Physically Based and Thermodynamically Based Constitutive Models for Soft Materials

Abstract: Abstract In this paper, we review constitutive models for soft materials. We specifically focus on physically-based models accounting for hyperelasticity, visco-hyperelasticity, and damage phenomena. For completeness, we include the thermodynamically-based visco-hyperelastic and damage models as well as the so-called mixed models. The models are put in the frame of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. Based on the available experimental data, we provide a qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the simplest possible idea, it is usually assumed that in real networks the crosslink contribution to the modulus is the same as in their topologically equivalent phantom networks, whereas the entanglement contribution to the modulus, G e , is assumed additive and for well-developed polymer networks simply given by the plateau modulus of high-molar-mass linear polymer melts. Following on from this simple idea, most of the existing tube models of polymer dynamics also assume the additivity of the entanglement and crosslink contributions. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the simplest possible idea, it is usually assumed that in real networks the crosslink contribution to the modulus is the same as in their topologically equivalent phantom networks, whereas the entanglement contribution to the modulus, G e , is assumed additive and for well-developed polymer networks simply given by the plateau modulus of high-molar-mass linear polymer melts. Following on from this simple idea, most of the existing tube models of polymer dynamics also assume the additivity of the entanglement and crosslink contributions. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6(a) represents the geometric modeling of the biopsy needle, which is a hollow cylinder with angle of inclination. In detail, the length of the needle tube is 50 mm, the initial definition of the outer diameter of the needle tube is 2.77 mm, the inner diameter is 2.16 mm, (4) According to existing research, muscle soft tissue is a relatively soft material, and its equivalent Young's modulus is about 20 GPa [30]. Therefore, the hyperelastic model can better describe its deformation behavior than the linear elastic model, especially when the deformation is large.…”
Section: Geometry Description Of the Composite Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are a large number of such models and no consensus on the best choice for any material. For example, Dal et al [1] list 44 different hyperelastic constitutive material models for elastomers alone and, similarly, there are several examples of viscoelastic models for rubbers and polymers [2]. Furthermore, closed-form models inherently restrict the type of behaviors that can be described, often rendering them incapable of accurately capturing the response of many materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%