2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2005.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of optimization techniques in metal cutting processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
197
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 442 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
197
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To establish the relationship between the cutting performance and the cutting parameters, few statistical models based on formal methods (optimal solutions) and non-conventional techniques (nearoptimal solutions) have been designed (Mukherjee and Pradip 2006). In conventional methods, experimental method-based approaches, such as the response surface methodology and the Taguchi methodology, were widely and successfully used.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To establish the relationship between the cutting performance and the cutting parameters, few statistical models based on formal methods (optimal solutions) and non-conventional techniques (nearoptimal solutions) have been designed (Mukherjee and Pradip 2006). In conventional methods, experimental method-based approaches, such as the response surface methodology and the Taguchi methodology, were widely and successfully used.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several modeling techniques of input-output and in-process parameter relationship using ANN sets offer a distribution-free alternative and have attracted the attention of manufacturing practitioners and researchers alike when they run into difficulties in building empirical models in metal cutting process control. These techniques can offer a cost effective alternative in the field of machine tool design and manufacturing approaches, and have thus received wide attention in recent years on optimization techniques in metal cutting processes, computers & industrial engineering [7].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers and authors have found classical optimization methods ineffective for solving machining optimization problems because of the following: a tendency to obtain a local optimal solution (Rao & Pawar, 2010), very complex nature and inability to handle multi-objective problems effectively (Rao & Kalyankar, 2013) and lack of robustness (Rao & Pawar, 2009;Rao & Pawar 2010). As noted by Mukherjee and Ray (2006), researchers and practitioners prefer an alternative cost effective near-optimal (or approximate) solution than the exact optimal one, as it may be extremely difficult to find the exact optimal point in the high dimensional and multimodal search space. Rao et al (2008) used the PSO algorithm to determine optimal machining parameter settings for an electro-chemical machining (ECM) process and compared its performance with that obtained by other optimization methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%