2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2010.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of normalization techniques in analytical atomic spectrometry with laser sampling: From single to multivariate correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the lower sensitivity and precision than the other elemental analysis methods is one of the major drawbacks especially in remote detection [2]. To improve LIBS, a lot of approaches have been proposed to enhance the analytical performance [3][4][5][6], and the double pulse LIBS (DP-LIBS) has been demonstrated by a number of studies [7][8][9][10][11], which is a very efficient approach for enhancing the intensity of plasma emission and improvement of the analytical capabilities of LIBS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lower sensitivity and precision than the other elemental analysis methods is one of the major drawbacks especially in remote detection [2]. To improve LIBS, a lot of approaches have been proposed to enhance the analytical performance [3][4][5][6], and the double pulse LIBS (DP-LIBS) has been demonstrated by a number of studies [7][8][9][10][11], which is a very efficient approach for enhancing the intensity of plasma emission and improvement of the analytical capabilities of LIBS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to mitigate this problem, several techniques like calibration-free LIBS [10] or normalization procedures have been proposed [11]. One simple possibility is so-called internal standardization, already discussed in the very first paper proposing the LIBS technique [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution is based on the intensity of the emission line of the element to be quantified being divided by the intensity of a weak spectral line of another element whose concentration is known or at least is constant among samples, as this ratio has been found to vary to a much lesser extent than the absolute intensity. However, not all pairs of lines are suitable candidates, as they must satisfy certain spectroscopic criteria: pairs with similar excitation potential, intensity differences smaller than 10 times, and spectral proximity have provided good results [11]. Therefore, depending on the sample, it is not always possible to find suitable lines for this internal standardization within the captured spectral range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kísérleteikben a mangán intenzitása és a tranziens akusztikus jel első csúcsa között jó korrelációt figyeltek meg. További referencia jelként szolgál a háttér teljes emissziója, az elektromos áram, a plazma hőmérséklete, az elektronsűrűség, a lézer impulzusenergiája, a teljes integrált emisszió és a Mie-szórás is [43]. Napjainkban az is előfordul, hogy jelnormalizációhoz nem ezeket az egyszerű, egy referencia értéken alapuló módszereket használják, hanem többváltozós módszereket.…”
Section: Jelnormalizációs Eljárásokunclassified