The sequestration of CO 2 in the deep geosphere is one potential method for reducing anthropogenic emissions to the atmosphere without necessarily incurring a significant change in our energy-producing technologies. Containment of CO 2 as a liquid and an associated hydrate phase, under cool conditions, offer an alternative underground storage approach compared to conventional supercritical CO 2 storage at higher temperatures. We briefly describe conventional approaches to underground storage, review possible approaches for using CO 2 hydrate in CO 2 storage generally, and comment on the important role CO 2 hydrate could play in underground storage. Cool underground storage appears to offer certain advantages in terms of physical, chemical and mineralogical processes, which may usefully enhance trapping of the stored CO 2 . This approach also appears to be potentially applicable to large areas of sub-seabed sediments offshore Western Europe.
words, 73 references, 6 figuresKeywords: Carbon dioxide. CO 2 , underground storage, sequestration, hydrate Running title: CO 2 HYDRATE AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE CO 2 HYDRATE AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE It is now widely accepted the rising levels of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in the Earth's atmosphere are causing global climate change, and this is a subject of international concern (e.g. IPCC 1990IPCC , 2007. Furthermore, if something is not done to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, predictions suggest an unprecedented rate of future temperature increase, with unknown, but possibly rapid, consequences for the global climate. Measurements show that global temperatures rose by 0.3-0.6°C in the 20th century. If the trends in current emissions continue there are suggestions (Karl et al. 2000;RCEP 2000) that the global mean temperature is likely to be about 3°C higher than at present by the end of the 21 st century. The main difficulty in attempting to combat climate change is the world population's high dependence on fossil fuels as an energy source. Alternatives such as solar energy and other renewables are making a useful contribution, and some countries presently rely heavily on nuclear power, nonetheless, the culture and lifestyle of many countries appear to be strongly linked to fossil fuel usage for many years to come.Assuming that we continue to burn fossil fuels, yet wish to mitigate CO 2 emissions to the atmosphere, we are faced with a limited number of alternatives:1. To reduce our CO 2 emissions by using lower carbon fuels (e.g. gas instead of coal); 2. To utilise the produced CO 2 ; 3. To dispose of the CO 2 in another domain of the planet, such as the geosphere, the terrestrial biosphere or the oceans. In order to stabilise atmospheric CO 2 concentrations at current values, it may be necessary to reduce CO 2 emissions by 60% or more over the next 50 years (RCEP 2000). Although many countries are making strenuous efforts to reduce their CO 2 emissions, this is proving extremely difficult because all countries, and not just the developing ones, c...