CO2 retention values in enhanced oil recovery

Olea, Ricardo A.

doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2015.03.012

Cited by 69 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The respective median values were 22.9 for clastic reservoirs and 26.1 for carbonate reservoirs. With the exception of a few outlier carbonates (less than 0.7 percent), the retention estimates are consistent with empirical data published by Olea (2015). Figures 14A and 14B indicate that both retention-factor distributions are right skewed.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Play-level distributions of estimates of recovery factors for a miscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery method used in oil reservoirs in the conterminous United States

Attanasi¹,

Freeman²

2016

Open-File Report

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Play-level distributions of estimates of recovery factors for a miscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery method used in oil reservoirs in the conterminous United States

Attanasi¹,

Freeman²

2016

Open-File Report

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Table B1 shows the relevant retention statistics for each evaluated play of the Power River Basin Province. These median play values are consistent with the empirical findings of Olea (2015). Table B1.…”

Section: Distributions Of Recovery Factors and Net Utilization Factorssupporting

confidence: 91%

Three approaches for estimating recovery factors in carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery

2017

Scientific Investigations Report

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The CO 2 injected is also normalized as a fraction of the OOIP, except that here the conversion is more elaborate because we are dealing with two different fluids, which in the U.S. system of units are measured in different units (Olea, 2015 …”

Section: Data Acquisition and Normalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%