1994
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5877(94)90073-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of methods used to adjust for cluster effects in explanatory epidemiological studies of animal populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study presented here tried to identify the factors and processing steps that contribute most to the overall contamination of carcasses and the slaughterhouse environment by using the same sampling protocol in 12 slaughterhouses in five European countries. For the statistical analyses, we used logistic regression analysis with random effects, which is a method widely used in veterinary epidemiology, where the occurrence of clustered data is common [23,24]. It is, however, to our knowledge the first time that this method has been used to identify factors associated with carcass contamination and explore the epidemiology of Salmonella contamination at the slaughterhouse level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study presented here tried to identify the factors and processing steps that contribute most to the overall contamination of carcasses and the slaughterhouse environment by using the same sampling protocol in 12 slaughterhouses in five European countries. For the statistical analyses, we used logistic regression analysis with random effects, which is a method widely used in veterinary epidemiology, where the occurrence of clustered data is common [23,24]. It is, however, to our knowledge the first time that this method has been used to identify factors associated with carcass contamination and explore the epidemiology of Salmonella contamination at the slaughterhouse level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to computational restraints, Mousing et al (1990) did not account adequately for the fact that the data were from clusters of animals (herds) (McDermott and Schukken, 1994). Mousing et al (1990) did, however, recognize this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the herd incidence rate, a binomial distribution must be performed for a dichotomous variable (lactation with/without CMAST). Unfortunately, these theoretical distributions are rarely observed because of the Statistical modelling for clinical mastitis 495 presence of overdispersion of the studied data [50,63], which involves defective adjustments and incorrect statistical tests.…”
Section: Overdispersion At the Lactation Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%