2015 IEEE 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icmla.2015.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Machine Learning Solutions to Denial-of-Services Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout Gunduz et al [22] looked at Denial of Service (DoS) attacks at each TCP/ IP protocol stack layer. Author attention was drawn to the network layer assaults, which are more diversified than the other layers of attacks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout Gunduz et al [22] looked at Denial of Service (DoS) attacks at each TCP/ IP protocol stack layer. Author attention was drawn to the network layer assaults, which are more diversified than the other layers of attacks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the authors in [6] have discussed WSNs and their crucial role in different applications and usage; the vulnerabilities of the WSN due to their constrained resources. How DoS attack can be carried out at different layers of the network architecture.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors focused specifically on the network layer because of the diversity of the attack at this layer. The authors reviewed many studies that use machine learning techniques pertaining to the network layer DoS attacks in WSN [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best results were achieved with one hidden layer. Gonduz et al [4] presented a survey of ML solutions for detecting DoS attacks. The DoS variations were reviewed at each layer of the TCP/IP protocol stack and focused on network layer attacks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%