A review of literature that uses the lens of the next generation science crosscutting concepts: 2012–2019

Abstract

New reforms in science education call for threedimensional learning by integrating disciplinary core ideas, science and engineering practices, and crosscutting concepts (CCCs). These reforms defined the new term, crosscutting concept (CCC), as a lens that has explanatory power across disciplines. To describe how researchers are examining and using the CCCs related to science teaching and learning, a literature review was conducted to identify articles that included the term "crosscutting concept" since its introduction in 2012. The articles were narrowed to those that use the term CCC as a component of the framing, analysis, findings, or discussion of their empirical or nonempirical article. A subset of the identified papers elaborated on the CCCs beyond existing policy documents and references. These papers were open-coded to identify themes in how the CCCs were used. The identified themes suggest that the CCCs are useful for science teaching, learning, and research in terms of creating opportunities to learn, connecting to the big idea, linking to practice, drawing on funds of knowledge, and connecting across topics and disciplines. These themes were analyzed to identify areas of existing focus and those in need of additional research. This synthesis of the literature has implications for using and studying

Djaji Mahsheye, Moghrabeye, and Labaneh: Making science relevant

“…Similarly, Tsurusaki et al (2013) showed how the teacher's use of transformative boundary objects to leverage students' cultural knowledge and experience within science instruction, promoted context where traditional boundaries between students' lives and school science are blurred, and a critical consciousness about how the food system works and its connections to their everyday food choices is supported. Fick and Arias (2022) acknowledged the role that crosscutting concepts (NRC, 2012) can serve as tools for identifying and including students' FoK within science instruction. Brown (2017) found that scientific practices, particularly the development, and use of scientific models, can also bridge the school-home dichotomy by leveraging family and community FoK and creating a space where students can examine and explain scientific concepts using both Western science and Indigenous Knowledge perspective.…”

Teacher professional development programs integrating science and language with multilingual learners: A conceptual framework

“…First, we introduce more sophisticated instructional practices over time as teachers develop a firmer grasp of the curriculum specifically and NGSS instruction with MLs broadly. For example, whereas three‐dimensional learning is emphasized from the outset of the PD program, CCCs tend to take a backseat to SEPs and DCIs in teachers' instructional practices (Fick & Arias, 2022). Thus, one focus of PD with returning teachers is making CCCs explicit in ways that harness the resources that all students, and MLs in particular, bring to the classroom (Nordine & Lee, 2021).…”

“So, we kind of started from scratch, no pun intended”: What can students learn from designing games?

“…The first strand informing our design approach relates to the challenge of integrating systems thinking in instructional materials (Fick, 2018; Fick & Arias, 2022) in order to address the diverse disciplinary fields that constitute climate science (Ledley et al, 2017). We define systems thinking as “a set of analytic skills used to improve the capability of identifying and understanding systems, [and] predicting their behaviors” (Arnold & Wade, 2015, p. 675).…”