2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-022-01820-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of harmonization strategies for quantitative PET

Abstract: PET can reveal in vivo biological processes at the molecular level. PET-derived quantitative values have been used as a surrogate marker for clinical decision-making in numerous clinical studies and trials. However, quantitative values in PET are variable depending on technical, biological, and physical factors. The variability may have a significant impact on a study outcome. Appropriate scanner calibration and quality control, standardization of imaging protocols, and any necessary harmonization strategies a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although SUVmax is the most widely used semiquantitative PET/CT parameter, variations across PET/CT scanners, protocols, and patient factors make it hard to generalize results. [ 22 , 23 ] As an alternative parameter, TLR may show lower interscan variability because of the reference normalization (usually using normal liver uptake), which results in better reproducibility than SUVmax. [ 24 , 25 ] In this regard, our study results imply that TLR could be widely applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although SUVmax is the most widely used semiquantitative PET/CT parameter, variations across PET/CT scanners, protocols, and patient factors make it hard to generalize results. [ 22 , 23 ] As an alternative parameter, TLR may show lower interscan variability because of the reference normalization (usually using normal liver uptake), which results in better reproducibility than SUVmax. [ 24 , 25 ] In this regard, our study results imply that TLR could be widely applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is described in the following steps of DWI harmonization, and PET normalization. We distinguish PET normalization from harmonization, as true harmonization in PET data can be only achieved by the scans of standardized phantom which were not available at the centers acquiring the data ( Akamatsu et al. 2023 ), while DWI harmonization can be achieved computationally.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated harmonization measures of accurate SUV quanti cation for oncological [ 18 F]FDG and neurological studies. Akamatsu et al list several investigations of the latest PET harmonization strategies [11]. For example, SUV harmonization can be based on the image uniformity and spatial resolution with tracer-speci c phantoms [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%