2010
DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2009.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Factors That Affect Artifact From Metallic Hardware on Multi-Row Detector Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite recent advances in imaging hardware and software filtering techniques [31, 32], the scatter effect in clinical CT can only be reduced, not neutralized. This finding applies to TrABL but also to other applications such as digital (2D or 3D) templating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent advances in imaging hardware and software filtering techniques [31, 32], the scatter effect in clinical CT can only be reduced, not neutralized. This finding applies to TrABL but also to other applications such as digital (2D or 3D) templating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Some attempts to reduce this inconvenience have been proposed, such as using higher kVp and/or mA, filtering algorithms, or changing the reconstruction thickness of the sections. 13,20,22 The present study focused on the reconstruction thickness variation, since this procedure does not involve re-exposure of the patient and can be performed by most dedicated CBCT reconstruction software, not requiring specific postprocessing tools. In order to specifically evaluate the impact of increasing the reconstruction thickness on the diagnosis of misfit, only two-dimensional images were evaluated instead of the whole CBCT volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In an attempt to reduce the appearance of artifacts in CBCT images, some strategies have been developed, most of them involving postprocessing of acquired data such as the use of smoothening filters or changing the reconstruction thickness of the images. 13 This would reduce metal artifacts and allow for higher diagnostic accuracy for such delicate tasks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to advances in CT technology, evaluation of the fusion mass has improved further with multiplanar reconstruction, artefact reduction, and sections with a thickness of 0.5-1 mm (34,(37)(38)(39). Due to these characteristics, CT is currently the most widely accepted standard imaging method in noninvasive evaluation of spinal fusion (27,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%