2019
DOI: 10.3233/ajw190027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Emission Reduction Potential and Cost Savings through Forest Carbon Sequestration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the findings demand for urgent need to implement both mitigation and adaptation strategies to reduce the negative impacts of CC on agriculture sector. Mitigation strategies include conservation of existing carbon stocks; conservation of forest biomass and soil carbon; reduction of carbon losses from biota and soils through management changes; reduction of losses of carbonrich ecosystems; prevention of deforestation; and enhancement of carbon sequestration in soils and biota through increases of forests (Smith et al 2014;Paterson and Lima 2018;Raihan et al 2019). Per-area mitigation options that reduce emission intensity also need to be promoted by improving the efficiency of production (i.e., less GHG emissions per unit of agricultural products) (Burney et al 2010;Bennetzen et al 2012) and the sustainable intensification of agriculture (Tilman et al 2009;Smith 2013;Garnett et al 2013).…”
Section: Conclusion and Potentials For Mitigation And Adaptation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the findings demand for urgent need to implement both mitigation and adaptation strategies to reduce the negative impacts of CC on agriculture sector. Mitigation strategies include conservation of existing carbon stocks; conservation of forest biomass and soil carbon; reduction of carbon losses from biota and soils through management changes; reduction of losses of carbonrich ecosystems; prevention of deforestation; and enhancement of carbon sequestration in soils and biota through increases of forests (Smith et al 2014;Paterson and Lima 2018;Raihan et al 2019). Per-area mitigation options that reduce emission intensity also need to be promoted by improving the efficiency of production (i.e., less GHG emissions per unit of agricultural products) (Burney et al 2010;Bennetzen et al 2012) and the sustainable intensification of agriculture (Tilman et al 2009;Smith 2013;Garnett et al 2013).…”
Section: Conclusion and Potentials For Mitigation And Adaptation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mitigation measures include conservation of carbon pool, effective management of tropical forest biodiversity and carbon stored in soil, sustainable agricultural and soil management practices, zero tillage to minimise carbon loss from soil and fauna, minimal encroachment rate, and preserving dense carbon forest reserve areas and ecosystems (Smith et al 2014;Paterson and Lima 2018;Sarkar et al 2020). Other mitigation strategies include enacting strict regulations on indiscriminate cutting down of trees, as well as promotion of afforestation to facilitate soil conservation and ground biomass cover to enhance carbon sequestration (Burney et al 2010;Bennetzen et al 2012;Smith et al 2014;Paterson and Lima 2018;Raihan et al 2019;Sarkar et al 2020). Another alternative pointed out refers to intensification of crop production via organic and smart agriculture (Tilman et al 2009;Garnett et al 2013;Smith 2013).…”
Section: Mitigation Strategies To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the AMB (Ambitious) scenario predicts annual forest loss of 50,000 hectares between 2015 and 2025, dropping to zero forest loss by 2030. The total forested area in 2020 for BAU, PLAN Forest biomass refers to the aboveground (tree biomass) and belowground (roots) biomass of trees in the forests [20]. Tree biomass refers to the oven-dry mass of the aerial part and the root of trees, and 50% of the dry mass of trees is carbon [3].…”
Section: Forested Area and Carbon Sequestration In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no significant change in terms of the carbon in litter. Forest biomass refers to the aboveground (tree biomass) and belowground (roots) biomass of trees in the forests [20]. Tree biomass refers to the oven-dry mass of the aerial part and the root of trees, and 50% of the dry mass of trees is carbon [3].…”
Section: Forested Area and Carbon Sequestration In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation