2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of cost estimation models for determining assembly automation level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ben-Arieh and Qian(2003) classified these into intuitive, analogical, parametric and analytical methods. In addition, these were broadly categorized into qualitative and quantitative approaches (Niazi et al , 2006; Caputo and Pelagagge, 2008; Layer et al , 2002; Salmi et al , 2016). These two categories were subdivided into different ways.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ben-Arieh and Qian(2003) classified these into intuitive, analogical, parametric and analytical methods. In addition, these were broadly categorized into qualitative and quantitative approaches (Niazi et al , 2006; Caputo and Pelagagge, 2008; Layer et al , 2002; Salmi et al , 2016). These two categories were subdivided into different ways.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because a cost estimation process determines the overall performances of manufacturing enterprises (Cavalieri et al , 2004; Wang et al , 2013). An overestimated product results in losses of business and goodwill in the market, whereas an underestimated one leads into financial losses to its enterprise (Salmi et al , 2016; H’mida et al , 2006; Niazi et al , 2006). Recent findings disclosed that only about 20% information is circulating in organizations in terms of structured and numeric data; however, the remainder 80% information is hidden in unstructured forms (Tseng and Chou, 2006; Feki et al , 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dedicated spreadsheet was developed with this aim, clustering the relevant information (Table 2 To answer the first research question (what are the most reliable cost analysis methods in the engineering design of forged components? ), an overview of the cost estimation methods was carried out based on the classification proposed by Niazi et al [19] and Salmi et al [20]. This classification was used to create the ground for the cost analysis in forged component design.…”
Section: Document Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several classification methods of cost approaches already exist in cost modelling literature. Salmi et al [20] proposed a classification method of cost approaches based on three aspects: (i) phase of applicability, (ii) granularity level, and (iii) approach type. The first classification reflects the design phase in which cost models are used: early and late design [25].…”
Section: Slr Framework: Analysis and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summaries and reviews have for example been published by [10][11][12][13]. Based on the cost models review done by Jönsson [13] and later extended by Ståhl [12], an overview of cost models available for assessing manufacturing has been compiled ( Table 1).…”
Section: Manufacturing Cost Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%