2007
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/r01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces

Abstract: In this paper we review classification algorithms used to design brain-computer interface (BCI) systems based on electroencephalography (EEG). We briefly present the commonly employed algorithms and describe their critical properties. Based on the literature, we compare them in terms of performance and provide guidelines to choose the suitable classification algorithm(s) for a specific BCI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
1,433
2
69

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,261 publications
(1,568 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
9
1,433
2
69
Order By: Relevance
“…The trade-off parameter C was selected at 100 and kernel parameter σ was chosen 0.5 [16], [17]. 10-fold cross validation was applied also in order to find the optimized parameters where the results were close with the selected parameters [18].…”
Section: Svm Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The trade-off parameter C was selected at 100 and kernel parameter σ was chosen 0.5 [16], [17]. 10-fold cross validation was applied also in order to find the optimized parameters where the results were close with the selected parameters [18].…”
Section: Svm Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hidden Markov Model (HMM) is a statistical model that has been used to different areas [17]- [20]. Lotte et al applied HMM on EEG based brain computer interfaces [17].…”
Section: E Hmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of a large number of time segments leads to high dimensionality of the feature vectors (which is [100 × 4097] for each class). Theoretically, if the number of training data is small compared to the size of the feature vectors, the classifier will most probably give poor results [20]. It is recommended to use at least five to ten times as many training samples per class as the dimensionality [21], [22].…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assist in ambulation rehabilitation, the method needs to detect the feature signal related to the voluntary walking in the EEG. The techniques that target various EEG features exist for analyzing EEG signals [1], such as power spectrum, spectral centroid, event-related potential (ERP), and principal component analysis (PCA) as well as factor analysis, independent component analysis (ICA), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), neural network analysis (NN), and support vector machine (SVM) classification. We focused on a combination of feature extraction techniques for real-time processing because our final goal is to develop a system that can be used on a daily basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%