2014
DOI: 10.7763/ijbbb.2014.v4.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Epileptic EEG Signals with Simple Random Sampling J48 Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest overall classification accuracies are highlighted in bold font. The best performance was obtained from the OA technique combined with the AR estimation method as well as SVM classifier, compared with the results obtained by the authors of [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Even though the extracted features by using the OA combined with the mentioned spectral methods were scored the second highest accuracy with a 99.9%, it is considered acceptable in the research of epileptic seizures detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The highest overall classification accuracies are highlighted in bold font. The best performance was obtained from the OA technique combined with the AR estimation method as well as SVM classifier, compared with the results obtained by the authors of [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Even though the extracted features by using the OA combined with the mentioned spectral methods were scored the second highest accuracy with a 99.9%, it is considered acceptable in the research of epileptic seizures detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The highest overall classification accuracies are highlighted in bold font. The best performance was obtained from the OA technique combined with the AR estimation method as well as SVM classifier, compared with the results obtained by the authors of [16–31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, we built an ensemble classifier called LibMutil that uses eight common classifiers, namely AdaBoost.M131, Bagging32, Naïve Bayes33, Logistic34, Random Forest35, Random Tree36, J4837, and KNN 38. The AdaBoost.M1, Bagging, Random Tree, and Random Forest classifiers are themselves ensemble learners; therefore, we used these classifiers as base learners to refine the performance of LibMutil, which in turn helped to improve the sensitivity of tRNAscan‐SE for pseudo‐tRNAs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%