2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Cardiac Radioablation (CR) for Arrhythmias: Procedures, Technology, and Future Opportunities

Abstract: Purpose: Cardiac radioablation (CR), a new treatment for cardiac arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation, has had promising clinical outcomes to date. There is consequent desire for rapid clinical adoption. However, CR presents unique challenges to radiation therapy, and it is paramount that clinical adoption be performed safely and effectively. Recent reviews comprehensively detail patient selection, clinical history, treatment outcomes, and treatment toxicities but only briefly me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a precise gating or tracking could be done without the need and limitations of a fiducial marker. This could further reduce the safety margins to be applied and perhaps reduce treatment times, particularly in case of respiratory gated delivery for radiotherapy with heavy particles such as protons and carbon ions ( 9 , 10 , 12 , 20 ). A further usefulness of this system could consist in increasing the safety in the treatment phase, by controlling in real time the cardiac cycle and heart movements and allowing to interrupt the delivery of the radiant beam in case of anomalies on each of these two factors with extremely short reaction times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, a precise gating or tracking could be done without the need and limitations of a fiducial marker. This could further reduce the safety margins to be applied and perhaps reduce treatment times, particularly in case of respiratory gated delivery for radiotherapy with heavy particles such as protons and carbon ions ( 9 , 10 , 12 , 20 ). A further usefulness of this system could consist in increasing the safety in the treatment phase, by controlling in real time the cardiac cycle and heart movements and allowing to interrupt the delivery of the radiant beam in case of anomalies on each of these two factors with extremely short reaction times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for target's movement management is of the utmost importance particularly in case of respiratory gated delivery for radiotherapy with heavy particles such as protons and carbon ions ( 9 , 10 ). At present, the strategies applied for cardio-respiratory movements compensation are limited by the need to consistently increase the size of the treated volume (e.g., internal target volume generated by 4D cardiac or respiratory CT or both), extend treatment time (e.g., gated delivery), and globally by the unsolved need to directly monitor cardio-respiratory movements in real-time without the use of fiducial markers ( 6 , 8 , 11 , 12 ). A possible solution to this issue could be represented by the use of echocardiography as a fully non-invasive tool for monitoring internal motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11–13 Radiotherapy treatment delivery is another challenge in the case of STAR treatments because of respiratory and cardiac motion of the target area. 13 Furthermore, the indication for STAR treatment is often given at a short notice due to incessant VT or electrical storm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since VT‐SBRT is a novel technique, a range of technical issues still need to be further investigated and optimized. 22 These include cardiac and respiratory motion management, methods for accurate co‐registration of several image modalities (e.g., computed tomography, magnetic resonance and electrocardiographic imaging maps), target volume delineation, and the optimization of treatment beam geometry to provide maximum sparing of proximal organs‐at‐risk (OARs). VT‐SBRT treatment planning performed to date has relied mainly on dose constraints available in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group reports for other SBRT techniques such as those for lung (RTOG 0915) 23 and spine (RTOG 0631), 24 as well as on Task Group Report 101 of the AAPM (TG‐101).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%