2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to reviews of recent freehand 3D-Ultrasound calibration methods [21,27] , the tested Curefab CS system performs state of the art. The point reconstruction measure retrieved a mean point accuracy of 1.52 mm in contrast to values ranging from 1.67 to 3.63 mm [27] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to reviews of recent freehand 3D-Ultrasound calibration methods [21,27] , the tested Curefab CS system performs state of the art. The point reconstruction measure retrieved a mean point accuracy of 1.52 mm in contrast to values ranging from 1.67 to 3.63 mm [27] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(ii) freehand 3D ultrasound devices without the use of a tracking system, which make use of specific image parameters such as speckle or echo intensities to register the series of 2D frames [17,18] and (iii) freehand 3D ultrasound systems with the use of a tracking system, which represents the most frequently used technique [19][20][21][22][23] . For pose (i.e., position and orientation) information, any tracking system which provides the position and orientation of a sensor in 3D space can be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of a surgical tool at any given moment is determined using the angles of the mechanical arm attached to the surgical tool, and is calculated relative to the mechanical arm's base. Although mechanical trackers have proven to be accurate, the major drawback is that they are cumbersome, thus limiting the freedom of movement during a procedure [28].…”
Section: Advanced Needle Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these potential sources of error, the position of the US image relative to the sensor must be calibrated accurately and precisely to avoid distortions in the reconstructed three-dimensional geometry. Calibration of this aspect of the free-hand three-dimensional scanning approach has been the subject of numerous publications [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Free-hand Scanning With Position Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%