A review of CAD‐based robot path planning for spray painting

Abstract

Purpose -Paint path planning for industrial robots is critical for uniform paint distribution, process cycle time and material waste, etc. However, paint path planning is still a costly and time-consuming process. Currently paint path planning has always caused a bottle-neck for manufacturing automation because typical manual teaching methods are tedious, error-prone and skill-dependent. Hence, it is essential to develop automated tool path-planning methods to replace manual paint path planning. The purpose of this paper is to review the existing automated tool path-planning methods, and investigate their advantages and disadvantages. Design/methodology/approach -The approach takes the form of a review of automated tool path-planning methods, to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the current technologies. Findings -Paint path planning is a very complicated task considering complex parts, paint process requirements and complicated spraying tools. There are some research and development efforts in this area. Based on the review of the methods used for paint path planning and simulation, the paper concludes that: the tessellated CAD model formats have many advantages in paint path planning and paint deposition simulation. However, the tessellated CAD model formats lack edge and connection information. Hence, it may not be suitable for some applications requiring edge following, such as welding. For the spray gun model, more complicated models, such as 2D models, should be used for both path planning and paint distribution simulation. Paint path generation methods should be able to generate a paint path for complex automotive parts without assumptions, such as presupposing a part with a continuous surface. Practical implications -The paper makes possible automated path generation for spray-painting process using industrial robots such that the pathplanning time can be reduced, the product quality improved, etc. Originality/value -The paper provides a useful review of current paint path-planning methodologies based on the CAD models of parts.

Tools for Robotics in SME Workcells: Challenges and Approaches for Calibration and Registration

“…Due to the time and expense required to bring a new robotic workcell online, end users and integrators prefer to design and program a workcell in a computer-aided design (CAD) system prior to even beginning workcell construction (e.g., [17,20,21]). This is called offline programming and provides the opportunity to reduce the programming time and improve productivity.…”

High‐level robot programming based on CAD: dealing with unpredictable environments

“…Pires et al (2004) proposes to extract robot motion information from a CAD DXF file and converting it into robot commands for welding purposes. A review of CADbased robot path planning for spray painting is presented by Chen et al (2009). Another study presents a method to generate 3D robot working paths for a robotic adhesive spray system for shoe outsoles and uppers (Kim, 2004).…”

An Offline Programming Method for the Robotic Deburring of Aerospace Components

“…CAD-based OffLine Programming (OLP) is a state-of-the-art alternative (e.g. [18,19,20]), usually faster but must be pursued by a CAD expert rather than a process expert; it is based on perfect geometries of either machining part, robot and the whole cell, so they require an additional real parameters tuning using different information sources. Among the OLP approaches offered on the market, one of the most interesting opportunity is given by touch probes and measuring arms (digitizers), able to generate a robot work path from a physical sample part, instead of a CAD model, not always available.…”