2016
DOI: 10.1080/15569543.2016.1237527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of available techniques for determination of nano-antimicrobials activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar conclusions were made in the studies on bacterial biofilms formed on hydroxyapatites [ 52 ]. Interestingly, some lethal effect of hydrogels with fluconazole on R. mucilaginosa biofilm was observed, in the contradiction to the results obtained in the experiment with the activity of pure fluconazole on planktonic cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar conclusions were made in the studies on bacterial biofilms formed on hydroxyapatites [ 52 ]. Interestingly, some lethal effect of hydrogels with fluconazole on R. mucilaginosa biofilm was observed, in the contradiction to the results obtained in the experiment with the activity of pure fluconazole on planktonic cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This concentration is then compared to a table produced by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to determine if a bacterium is susceptible, intermediate, or resistant to the antibiotic [ 11 ]. This method also allows researchers to determine the lowest concentration of an antibiotic that is able to eliminate 99.9% bacteria, also known as the minimum bacterial concentration (MBC) [ 13 ]. The test tubes or wells can be viewed under a microscope to determine this concentration.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the electrode surface carried a positive charge when the bioreactor was maintained above pH 5.5, while a negative charge would be dominant when the pH was below 5.5. Biofilm development on the electrodes at different working pH values could then be perceived in terms of surface charge interaction (Hoseinzadeh et al, 2014(Hoseinzadeh et al, , 2017a. As the pH zpc of the inoculant biomass was 6.7, it can be concluded that the bacteria cells experienced a repulsion force during the initial adhesion step.…”
Section: Ph Zpc Of Biofilm and Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the parabolic dependence of biofilm cell density on an electrode when a current is applied, the surface property of the electrodes, as well as the bacteria, must be evaluated. Determining the charge types of the surfaces (i.e., the electrodes and biofilm) could directly lead to a qualitative judgment of the type of interaction (attraction or interaction) between bacteria and the surface (Hoseinzadeh et al, 2014(Hoseinzadeh et al, , 2017a. When an electrode was maintained at a smaller potential, the biomass cells experienced a repulsion force in the initial adhesion step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%