2013
DOI: 10.1166/sl.2013.2653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Automated Formal Verification of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: This paper surveys how formal verification can be used to prove the correctness of ad hoc routing protocols, which are fundamental infrastructure of wireless sensor networks. The existing techniques fall into two classes: verification on small-scale networks and verification on unbounded networks. The former one is always fully automatic and easy to use, thanks to the limited state space generated in verification. However, it cannot prove the correctness over all cases. The latter one can provide a complete pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While formal methods, in particular model checking, have been successfully used to model and analyse protocols for wireless sensor systems, the number of possible configurations that needs to be considered for larger WSNs impacts their feasibility. Chen et al reviewed how different formal methods may be used to investigate ad-hoc routing protocols [19], suggesting that model checking is suitable for small networks, while analytical methods are necessary for larger networks. Yue and Katoen [21] used probabilistic model checking to optimise the energy consumption of a leader election protocol in networks of up to nine nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While formal methods, in particular model checking, have been successfully used to model and analyse protocols for wireless sensor systems, the number of possible configurations that needs to be considered for larger WSNs impacts their feasibility. Chen et al reviewed how different formal methods may be used to investigate ad-hoc routing protocols [19], suggesting that model checking is suitable for small networks, while analytical methods are necessary for larger networks. Yue and Katoen [21] used probabilistic model checking to optimise the energy consumption of a leader election protocol in networks of up to nine nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various works have been proposed for protocol verification including rigorous specification and conformance testing techniques for network protocols [212], rigorous treatment of the TCP protocol [165] [196], verification of ad-hoc routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: [213]. There have been a few survey papers written focusing on communication protocols [214] [7], including a FSM-based protocol verification survey [211] and a survey documenting experience with protocol description [5].…”
Section: A Protocol Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al (2013) provide an extensive review of automated formal verification techniques of ad hoc routing protocols for WSN; Katelman et al (2008) propose a formallybased system redesign methodology used to redesign a version of the LMST topology protocol that ensures network connectivity under realistic deployment conditions. Elleuch et al (2011) apply a probabilistic framework to formally reason about the expected values of coverage intensity in a WSN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%