2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(02)00156-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of approaches to quality assurance of veterinary systems for health-status certification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the latter approach focuses on the activities and services (the 'output'), rather than on the structure and organisation of a Veterinary Service, it has the advantage that Veterinary Services can be organised and function in different ways, according to the specific needs and capabilities of the country concerned. On the other hand, the implementation of such internationally accepted quality assurance standards is a complex, costly and time-consuming matter (16), and therefore difficult to achieve, especially in countries with few financial resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the latter approach focuses on the activities and services (the 'output'), rather than on the structure and organisation of a Veterinary Service, it has the advantage that Veterinary Services can be organised and function in different ways, according to the specific needs and capabilities of the country concerned. On the other hand, the implementation of such internationally accepted quality assurance standards is a complex, costly and time-consuming matter (16), and therefore difficult to achieve, especially in countries with few financial resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of all scores leads to a global score between 0 and 100 for the evaluated Veterinary Service, with a score of 100 reflecting the 'perfect' Veterinary Service. The choice of the evaluation criteria, their weighting and the attribution of the scores are nevertheless somewhat arbitrary (16,17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High‐quality data are essential for the credibility of a surveillance system (Stark and others 2002, Salman and others 2003). The motivation of the data suppliers, feedback, confidentiality, traceability, training, computerisation, and simple and standardised data collection methods have been identified as important factors to ensure high‐quality data (Anon 1999, Thrusfield 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os resultados e métodos aqui apresentados fazem parte da primeira etapa de um STÄRK et al, 2002). O comércio internacional de animais vivos e seus produtos representam uma ameaça potencial significativa de propagação de doenças entre países e importadores exigem comprovações cada vez mais objetivas da situação sanitária do país exportador em relação a certos agentes patogênicos (SCHUPPERS et al, 2012; No Brasil, a comercialização e distribuição de suídeos destinados à reprodução somente é permitida quando estes são procedentes de Granjas de Reprodutores Suídeos Certificadas (GRSC).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Nenhuma metodologia encontra-se estabelecida e padronizada para avaliação de sistemas de vigilância em saúde animal RISKSUR, 2013 Verificou-se que o mapeamento de sistemas de vigilância complexos por árvore de cenários é um método que possui bons parâmetros de objetividade, transparência e praticidade, além de permitir a obtenção de resultados quantitativos e a inclusão de fatores epidemiológicos e econômicos na avaliação final do modelo STÄRK et al, 2002). Pode incorporar informações oriundas tanto de atividades de vigilância ativa, quanto passiva, assim como de fontes de dados aleatórias ou de amostragens direcionadas, facilitando o alcance de uma boa representatividade na avaliação .…”
Section: Definição Do Foco E Dos Atributos Quantificados Na Avaliação: Sensibilidade E Valor Preditivo Negativo (Vpn) Do Sistema De Vigilunclassified