2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of advances in EDCs and PhACs removal by nanofiltration: Mechanisms, impact factors and the influence of organic matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are numerous indicators for assessing these properties, such as hydrophobicity, MWCO, charge, molecular size, diffusion coefficient, and among others. These parameters should be adequately considered when investigating the influence of the three main mechanisms of compound removal in NF [ 136 ]. The RO and NF membranes could adequately retain a vast majority of EDCs pollutants, dissolved solutes, and salts owing to their molecular weight in the range of 200–400 Da [ 137 ].…”
Section: Rejection Of Edcs By Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are numerous indicators for assessing these properties, such as hydrophobicity, MWCO, charge, molecular size, diffusion coefficient, and among others. These parameters should be adequately considered when investigating the influence of the three main mechanisms of compound removal in NF [ 136 ]. The RO and NF membranes could adequately retain a vast majority of EDCs pollutants, dissolved solutes, and salts owing to their molecular weight in the range of 200–400 Da [ 137 ].…”
Section: Rejection Of Edcs By Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isoelectric point and feed water quality play essential roles in charge exclusion during the separation process [ 136 ]. The NF membranes are amphiprotic, determined by their isoelectric point, and most NF membranes are negatively charged.…”
Section: Rejection Of Edcs By Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the different advanced treatment methods employed in the drinking water sector, for the effective removal of natural organic matter and organic contaminants of emerging concern, membrane filtration processes, including nanofiltration (NF) [5,6] and ultrafiltration (UF) in combination with upstream powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption (PAC/UF) [7][8][9][10][11] are the most popular. Full-scale installations can be found in France (Méry-sur-Oise plant in the northern part of Paris) [12], Lausanne (Switzerland), Vigneux (France), Kopper (Slovenia) and San Antonio (Texas) [12,13], where the main drivers for their adaptation have been the remediation of surface waters polluted with pesticides, taste and odours, as well as disinfection-by-products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach is quite expensive. Nanofiltration is also used to purify drinking water and has been applied increasingly in municipal water treatment plants because it has a high removal rate of organic pollutants, while it simultaneously reserves significant amounts of minerals beneficial for drinking water [18]. Compared with conventional drinking water treatment, membranes efficiently remove color and turbidity, ions (up to 97 %), metals and metalloids (ranging from 80 to 100 %) and pharmaceuticals [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%