2022
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202202368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reversibly Porous Supramolecular Peptide Framework**

Abstract: The ability to use bio-inspired building-blocks in the assembly of novel supramolecular frameworks is at the forefront of this exciting research field. Herein, we present the first polyproline helix to self-assemble into a reversibly porous, crystalline, supramolecular peptide framework (SPF). This framework is assembled from a short oligoproline, adopting the polyproline II conformation, driven by hydrogen-bonding and dispersion interactions. Thermal activation, guest-induced dynamic porosity and enantioselec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly this framework adopted the endo conformation similarly to P4 alone, having significantly less impact on the channel volume, and thus contained EtOH within the pores rather than H2O (Figure 5-6c). As mentioned previously the P4 peptide framework could be activated by heating (45 o C) under reduced pressure, 24 with characterisation through both PDXRD and SCXRD showing encapsulated EtOH had been removed, forming a collapsed non-porous structure. As the mixed framework exhibited a very similar structure to the P4 framework, with EtOH encapsulated in accessible channels(Figure 5-6), while the P2HP peptide framework contained water trapped in isolated pores (Figure 5b-6b), and significantly showed no change after attempted activation (SI 3.2.4, Figure S42), we anticipated the mixed framework would exhibit different behaviour to the peptides alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly this framework adopted the endo conformation similarly to P4 alone, having significantly less impact on the channel volume, and thus contained EtOH within the pores rather than H2O (Figure 5-6c). As mentioned previously the P4 peptide framework could be activated by heating (45 o C) under reduced pressure, 24 with characterisation through both PDXRD and SCXRD showing encapsulated EtOH had been removed, forming a collapsed non-porous structure. As the mixed framework exhibited a very similar structure to the P4 framework, with EtOH encapsulated in accessible channels(Figure 5-6), while the P2HP peptide framework contained water trapped in isolated pores (Figure 5b-6b), and significantly showed no change after attempted activation (SI 3.2.4, Figure S42), we anticipated the mixed framework would exhibit different behaviour to the peptides alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…, This change in properties of the framework was exemplified through the repetition of thermal activation studies carried out on the P4 framework previously, whereby encapsulated solvent could be removed resulting in the collapse of the channels forming a non-porous structure. 24 In this case heating the P2HP framework under reduced pressure at 45 o C did not show the formation of a second crystalline phase (Figure S42, SI 3.2.4), showing how the solvent filled voids are now trapped in place by the additional hydroxyl moieties. This ability to functionalise the pores of the framework with no disruption of the peptide helix, thereby allowing tuning of the selectivity of the pores has clear applications towards specific host-guest interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations