2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2018.2840997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reverse Bearings Only Target Motion Analysis for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these errors may seem large, we argue that for the task of localizing an AUV in a long term mission, this is still acceptable. This is because, first, after a few hours especially in deep water, the self-navigation system of the AUV completely drifts and thus any localization solution of limited expected error will benefit the operation [96], and second, compared to the typical detection range of roughly 5 km for the AUV's pinger (e.g., [97]), the above reported localization error as in our experiment is still a good result. Given that this result was obtained using only one receiver in real sea conditions, it demonstrates well the applicability of our suggested localization method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…While these errors may seem large, we argue that for the task of localizing an AUV in a long term mission, this is still acceptable. This is because, first, after a few hours especially in deep water, the self-navigation system of the AUV completely drifts and thus any localization solution of limited expected error will benefit the operation [96], and second, compared to the typical detection range of roughly 5 km for the AUV's pinger (e.g., [97]), the above reported localization error as in our experiment is still a good result. Given that this result was obtained using only one receiver in real sea conditions, it demonstrates well the applicability of our suggested localization method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…This is because, after a few hours and especially in deep waters, the self-navigation system of the AUV would drift significantly: thus, any localization solution of limited expected error will benefit the operation. 50 Moreover, compared to the typical detection range of roughly 5 km for the AUV's pinger (e.g., Ref. 51), the above reported localization error as in our experiment is still a good result.…”
Section: B Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…INTRODUCTION utonomous underwater vehicles (AUV) is an indispensable carrier for human to investigate and study marine resources [1][2]. Underwater positioning technology is one of the key technologies for underwater vehicles to carry out underwater operations [3][4][5]. The medium environment of the ocean determines that sound is more suitable as a propagation carrier for underwater positioning technology than light and electromagnetic waves [6][7].…”
Section: Index Terms-ultra-short Baseline (Usbl); Installation Error Angle; Attitude Determination; Observation Vectors; Real-time Calibrmentioning
confidence: 99%