2005
DOI: 10.1080/01449290500066661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective look at website accessibility over time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study found that the average accessibility level of social work education websites increased significantly from 2003 to 2008 [14]. On the other hand, some other longitudinal evaluation studies found web accessibility to be less accessible as webpage complexity increases [11,12,15].…”
Section: Web Accessibility Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study found that the average accessibility level of social work education websites increased significantly from 2003 to 2008 [14]. On the other hand, some other longitudinal evaluation studies found web accessibility to be less accessible as webpage complexity increases [11,12,15].…”
Section: Web Accessibility Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Given the fact that many websites fail to achieve web accessibility, a phenomenon that has been widely revealed by many researchers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], there is likelihood that Chinese websites may have major accessibility problems; however, there is a lack of research into the accessibility of Chinese websites. This paper thus aims to provide an overview of the status of web accessibility in China according to two evaluations, one in 2009 and the other in 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case study Muylle and Moenaert [61] 22 Survey Rosena and Purintonb [74] 16 Experiment Liu et al [53] 15 Experiment Liu [55] 13 Experiment Udo and Marquis [87] 13 Survey Pikkarainen et al [71] 12 Survey Yang et al [96] 11 Survey Ozok and Salvendy [64] 7 Experiment Herrera-Viedma et al [36] 6 Concept development Mateos et al [57] 5 Content analysis Hong and Kim [38] 4 Survey Hackett and Parmanto [32] 4 Automatic evaluation Park and Noh [66] 4 Experiment Hackett et al [33] 3 Automatic evaluation Davoli et al [21] 3 Case study van Schaik and Ling [90] 2 Experiment Parmanto and Zeng [68] 2 Automatic evaluation Bauer and Scharl [8] 2…”
Section: General Trend Of the Reviewed Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, while work has been undertaken at the intersection of Web accessibility and Web evolution there has been little work of the kind undertaken here and there are no sources which specifically would enable us to support our anecdotal assertions. Studies to understand the extent of accessibility and assist in addressing these failings have been undertaken [24], but, these studies have only considered how changes in Web design have affected accessibility over time, and suggested possible solutions to address these problems without a full scale accessibility re-evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%