“…Of note, the long-acting G-CSF pegfilgrastim was used instead of a short-acting G-CSF in most previous cases (11/13 cases). Indeed, Sasaki et al conducted a single-institution retrospective study of G-CSF-associated aortitis and reported that the incidence of aortitis was significantly higher when long-acting pegfilgrastim was administered (5 cases of aortitis out of 669 administrations, 0.75%) than when short-acting filgrastim was administered (no aortitis out of 490 total administrations, 0.0%) ( 8 ). These previous findings suggest two possibilities: 1) long-acting pegfilgrastim is more likely to induce aortitis than short-acting filgrastim, or 2) G-CSF usage as prophylactic treatment (i.e., G-CSF initiation before the onset of neutropenia) is more likely to induce aortitis than as reactive treatment (i.e., G-CSF initiation after the onset of neutropenia).…”