2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective analysis of proceduralist-directed, nurse-administered propofol sedation for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that the majority of patients were administered propofol by continuous infusion and use of continuous infusions was conspicuously higher in the group that had more serious adverse events (91% versus 73%, P =0.001). Greater total doses of propofol were also associated with higher adverse event rates ( P =0.001) . A second prospective observational study using propofol in 269 consecutive patients undergoing a cardiovascular implantable electronic devices procedure, including lead extraction, reported a respiratory complication rate of 19% (comprising hypoxia 86%, apnea 30%, and aspiration 2%).…”
Section: Ep Procedures—evidence For Sedation Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is noteworthy that the majority of patients were administered propofol by continuous infusion and use of continuous infusions was conspicuously higher in the group that had more serious adverse events (91% versus 73%, P =0.001). Greater total doses of propofol were also associated with higher adverse event rates ( P =0.001) . A second prospective observational study using propofol in 269 consecutive patients undergoing a cardiovascular implantable electronic devices procedure, including lead extraction, reported a respiratory complication rate of 19% (comprising hypoxia 86%, apnea 30%, and aspiration 2%).…”
Section: Ep Procedures—evidence For Sedation Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the above studies, Sayfo et al performed a single‐center retrospective review of PDNA sedation with propofol for 582 ICD implants. They reported a 10% rate of 1 or more serious events, including 1 requiring intubation for excess sedation, 4 requiring unplanned intensive‐care unit admission for hypoxemia, 9 requiring PPV, and 47 needing significant hemodynamic support.…”
Section: Ep Procedures—evidence For Sedation Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,9 For the past few years, most authors have suggested a combination of sedation and local anaesthesia. [10][11][12][13] However, anaesthetic supervision and practice vary widely among centres. 14 The aim of this prospective, observational study was to describe the rate, clinical characteristics and risk factors for complications occurring during CIED implantation involving an anaesthetic team in a university hospital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Inadequate sedation, however, may interfere with patient and operator comfort compromising the procedural result and eventually increasing the risk of cardiac complications due to patient stress. 6 Inadequate sedation, however, may interfere with patient and operator comfort compromising the procedural result and eventually increasing the risk of cardiac complications due to patient stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%