2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A research note: Are auditors unable to detect classification shifting or merely not willing to report it? Evidence from India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several previous studies have attempted to explain the association between classification shifting and other research variables (for example , Abernathy et.al. 2014;Chae& Nakano, 2015;Desai& Nagar, 2016). Overall, these studies provide important insights into the reasons that encourage management to practice classification shifting.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several previous studies have attempted to explain the association between classification shifting and other research variables (for example , Abernathy et.al. 2014;Chae& Nakano, 2015;Desai& Nagar, 2016). Overall, these studies provide important insights into the reasons that encourage management to practice classification shifting.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…al, 2002) A considerable amount of research indicated that auditors fail to curb this form of earnings management in countries with weak, inefficient legal institutions, as the willingness to report such misclassifications is primarily driven by the perceived strength of the institutional controls and legal regimes. (Haw et.al, 2011;Desai& Nagar, 2016) 3. Discussion and implications…”
Section: Undetectability By External Monitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Athanasakou, et al, 2011;Zalata and Roberts, 2016) ‫نيا‬ ‫اس‬ ‫نرق‬ ‫ش‬ ‫ني‬ ‫ف‬ ‫نت‬ ‫يم‬ ‫اليي‬ ‫اسات‬ ‫الدر‬ ‫يجت‬ ‫اسي‬ ‫كما‬ . (Haw, et al, 2011) ‫ناد‬ ‫ب‬ ‫نب‬ ‫يباي‬ ‫نال‬ ‫س‬ ‫الد‬ ‫في‬ ‫المبالغة‬ ‫بغية‬ ‫الدالل‬ ‫قائمة‬ ‫نى‬ ‫عم‬ ‫نرافات‬ ‫المص‬ ‫نن‬ ‫م‬ ‫نغيمية‬ ‫اليش‬ ‫ناد‬ ‫الب‬ ‫نب‬ ‫يباي‬ ‫نبلل‬ ‫ال‬ ‫نن‬ ‫م‬ ‫اليشغيمي‬ ‫الل‬ ‫اسة‬ ‫در‬ ‫يائج‬ ‫اييعق‬ ‫يشغيمية.‬ ‫يير‬ ‫اد‬ ‫ب‬ ‫ها‬ ‫أ‬ (Noh, et al, 2014 (Haw, et al, 2011;Desai and Nagar, 2016 (Ertimur, et al, 2003;Marquardt and Wiedman, 2004 (McVay, 2006, Cohen et al, 2009, Zalata and Roberts, 2017, Fan, et al, 2010, Fan, et al, 2017…”
Section: ‫البحث‬ ‫ممخص‬unclassified
“…Penerapan teori fraud pentagon dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sebuah kompetensi menggambarkan kemampuan karyawan untuk memahami pengendalian internal yang ada di dalam suatu organi sasi, kemudian mampu mengembangkan strategi penggelapan yang canggih, serta dapat melakukan kontrol terhadap situasi sosial yang bisa memberikan keuntungan yaitu dengan mempengaruhi pihak lain agar bersedia melakukan kerja sama dengannya (Abuazza, Mihret, James, & Best, 2015;Ako mea-Frimpong, Andoh, & Ofosu-Hene, 2016;Boyle, DeZoort, & Hermanson, 2015;Desai & Nagar, 2016). Hal ini mengindikasikan bah wa sistem pengendalian yang dilakukan oleh Inspektorat masih lemah sehingga bisa mem buka peluang bagi auditee untuk melakukan fraud.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified