2021
DOI: 10.4337/9781788978033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Research Agenda for Geographies of Slow Violence

Abstract: works primarily on issues of urban poverty as they affect children in low-income countries, bridging the gap between the concerns of child-focused agencies and the broader development agenda. She is co-editor of the journal Environment and Urbanization, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, and an associate at the Children's Environments Research Group at CUNY Graduate Center in New York.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 252 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thinking along feminist geopolitics lines, Jenna Marie Christian and Lorraine Dowler argue for a more ‘relational’ approach to violence, enabling treatment of ‘fast and slow violence as a “single complex”’ (2019, p. 1067; see also Pain, 2015; for recent feminist elaborations of slow and chronic violence, see Cahill & Pain, 2019; O’Lear, 2021; Pain, 2021, 2022; Pain & Cahill, 2022). Returning to the theorization of continuities between different forms and modalities of violence (cultural, structural, direct), such an approach departs from the binarized framework implicitly inscribed in Nixon's formulation, offering ‘a vital pathway to address the representational challenge of slow violence's invisibility’ (Christian & Dowler, 2019, p. 1068).…”
Section: Feminist Geopolitics' Relational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thinking along feminist geopolitics lines, Jenna Marie Christian and Lorraine Dowler argue for a more ‘relational’ approach to violence, enabling treatment of ‘fast and slow violence as a “single complex”’ (2019, p. 1067; see also Pain, 2015; for recent feminist elaborations of slow and chronic violence, see Cahill & Pain, 2019; O’Lear, 2021; Pain, 2021, 2022; Pain & Cahill, 2022). Returning to the theorization of continuities between different forms and modalities of violence (cultural, structural, direct), such an approach departs from the binarized framework implicitly inscribed in Nixon's formulation, offering ‘a vital pathway to address the representational challenge of slow violence's invisibility’ (Christian & Dowler, 2019, p. 1068).…”
Section: Feminist Geopolitics' Relational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographers have usefully employed the concept of slow violence to make sense of a variety of multi-scalar harms across many different contexts, with lively debates recently filling geography journal special issues and an edited collection (Cahill & Pain, 2019;O'Lear, 2021;Pain, 2021aPain, , 2021bPain & Cahill, 2022). These works do an excellent job of surveying geographical work on slow violence, so rather than reviewing the burgeoning literature, this section draws more narrowly on feminist and Black geographies scholarship to advance two critiques of slow violence in the spirit of making space for a concept of violence that pays specific attention to its enduring qualities.…”
Section: Slow Violence?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper makes two contributions. First, it offers the concept of enduring violence as a supplement to feminist political geographical work on slow violence (Cahill & Pain, 2019; O'Lear, 2021; Pain & Cahill, 2022) and associated concepts such as ‘everyday’ (Cuomo, 1996; Mustafa et al, 2019), ‘banal’ (Christian et al, 2016; Katz, 2007; Koch & Paasi, 2016), and ‘chronic’ violence (Pain, 2019). Where this work has usefully distinguished between ‘acute’ and ‘chronic’ forms of violence (e.g., Pain, 2021a), it has also tended, conceptually and methodologically, to privilege the latter.…”
Section: The Great March Of Returnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation