2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
3,351
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,721 publications
(3,376 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
8
3,351
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The derived coregistration parameters were applied to the subject's CBF and CMRgl images. To allow across‐subject comparisons, each subject's structural MRI was diffeomorphically mapped to an unbiased structural MR image template using advanced normalization tools (ANTs) 44. The derived normalization parameters were applied to the subject's coregistered CBF and CMRgl images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derived coregistration parameters were applied to the subject's CBF and CMRgl images. To allow across‐subject comparisons, each subject's structural MRI was diffeomorphically mapped to an unbiased structural MR image template using advanced normalization tools (ANTs) 44. The derived normalization parameters were applied to the subject's coregistered CBF and CMRgl images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm builds an average shaped brain within the diffeomorphic space (see Klein et al, 2010). Afterwards, all images were normalized to this template, using the antsIntroduction script (Avants et al, 2011). For both steps, cross-correlational similarity metric was used and a diffeomorphic image registration using Greedy SyN was applied.…”
Section: Mri Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pCT (moving image) was first rigidly registered to the CBCTs (fixed images) using mutual information 18 , 19 as a metric. Deformable image registration was then applied from the pCT to the CBCTs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity metric used in this stage was mutual information. For the second stage, the deformable registration was applied to the soft tissue only using the mean squared difference metric (19) . The deformed planning CT, which we refer to as the intensity‐corrected CBCT (cCBCT), is geometrically similar to the CBCT but with HUs that are well calibrated for WET calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation