2010 IEEE 16th Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/prdc.2010.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Replacement Strategy for Canary Flip-Flops

Abstract: The deep submicron semiconductor technologies increase parameter variations. The increase in parameter variations requires excessive design margin that has serious impact on performance and power consumption. In order to eliminate the excessive design margin, we are investigating canary Flip-Flop (FF). Canary FF requires additional circuits consisting of an FF and a comparator. Thus, it suffers large area overhead. In order to reduce the area overhead, this paper proposes a selective replacement method for can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of [4], [5] is to minimize the overhead of adaptive body bias (ABB), but it assumes ABB is applied to all clusters. Another work [11] restricts variation sensors only at timing critical paths so that the overhead is not excessively large. However, it does not consider control or voltage generation overhead.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of [4], [5] is to minimize the overhead of adaptive body bias (ABB), but it assumes ABB is applied to all clusters. Another work [11] restricts variation sensors only at timing critical paths so that the overhead is not excessively large. However, it does not consider control or voltage generation overhead.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These operations are processed with the help of different kind of normal or application specific MAC units. The Block diagram of a classical DSP is presented [13] in Fig. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%