2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.107186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A repeatable and robust local reference frame for 3D surface matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To realize the rotation invariance, we propose a simplified local reference frame (LRF) for the patches, i.e., SLRF. We define the coordinate system of original point clouds as global reference frame, while LRF is a local coordinate system (with three orthogonal axes) built on a local patch surface, which is considered as repeatable under rigid rotations [44], [45], [46]. We rotate the patches to a fixed position by the rotation matrix between SLRF and global reference frame.…”
Section: Coordinate Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To realize the rotation invariance, we propose a simplified local reference frame (LRF) for the patches, i.e., SLRF. We define the coordinate system of original point clouds as global reference frame, while LRF is a local coordinate system (with three orthogonal axes) built on a local patch surface, which is considered as repeatable under rigid rotations [44], [45], [46]. We rotate the patches to a fixed position by the rotation matrix between SLRF and global reference frame.…”
Section: Coordinate Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alignment with a Reference Axis. Given a specific point p ∈ P in a local surface, we first estimate a reference axis n p oriented to the viewpoint [38,1] from its neighbouring point set P s = {p i : p i − p 2 ≤ R} within a support radius R. We then align n p with the Z-axis using a rotation matrix R z . Compared with the external local reference frames which are likely to be ambiguous and unstable, our estimated n p tends to be more robust and stable with regard to rotation changes [42].…”
Section: Spatial Point Transformermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods use geometric features (GA-Based) [ 28 ] to estimate the LRF, including the point position, normal, curvature, projection height, and gradient. In particular, Ao [ 29 ] is an LRF estimation method used for CA-Based and GA-Based (Mix-Based). From the definition of the X-axis, Ao [ 29 ] uses the height information to remap the projected point cloud, which is consistent with the definition of the GA method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Ao [ 29 ] is an LRF estimation method used for CA-Based and GA-Based (Mix-Based). From the definition of the X-axis, Ao [ 29 ] uses the height information to remap the projected point cloud, which is consistent with the definition of the GA method. Compared with the CA-Based method, the GA-Based method and Mix-Based method are more robust in complex scenarios as they calculate the X-axis separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation