2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.12149
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SpinNet: Learning a General Surface Descriptor for 3D Point Cloud Registration

Abstract: Extracting robust and general 3D local features is key to downstream tasks such as point cloud registration and reconstruction. Existing learning-based local descriptors are either sensitive to rotation transformations, or rely on classical handcrafted features which are neither general nor representative. In this paper, we introduce a new, yet conceptually simple, neural architecture, termed SpinNet, to extract local features which are rotationally invariant whilst sufficiently informative to enable accurate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3DSmoothNet first uses local reference frame to orient patches, then uses a 3D convolutional neural network on the patches with a smooth density to compute features. Following the success of 3DSmoothNet, MultiView [25], DIP [29] and SpinNet [2] also improved upon the generalization capabilities from the 3DMatch dataset [51] to the ETH dataset [30]. But even if these methods are rotation invariant, patch-based methods are very slow.…”
Section: End-to-end Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3DSmoothNet first uses local reference frame to orient patches, then uses a 3D convolutional neural network on the patches with a smooth density to compute features. Following the success of 3DSmoothNet, MultiView [25], DIP [29] and SpinNet [2] also improved upon the generalization capabilities from the 3DMatch dataset [51] to the ETH dataset [30]. But even if these methods are rotation invariant, patch-based methods are very slow.…”
Section: End-to-end Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ETH, the evaluation protocol that we have chosen is different from previous papers. We prefer using the more rigorous protocol described by Fontana et al [16]: we compare our method on the 8 scenes of the dataset and not just the 4 included in previous published works like [4,14,2,29,19].…”
Section: Eth Dataset [30] (Target Dataset)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These descriptors are usually designed for TLS or MLS point clouds and their generalization potential to ALS point clouds is uncertain. Therefore we tested multiple 3D descriptors, namely FPFH (Rusu et al, 2009), SHOT (Tombari et al, 2010b), USC (Tombari et al, 2010a), SpinNet (Ao et al, 2021), FCGF (Choy et al, 2019) and LCD (Pham et al, 2019). While not being fully detailed here, we provide some evaluation of their suitability with respect to our ALS experimental data in Appendix 1.…”
Section: Point Description and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract better geometrical features, Graphite [11] utilizes graph neural networks for local patch description. SpinNet [30] utilizes LRF for patch alignment and 3D cylindrical convolution layers for feature extraction, achieving the best generalization ability to unseen datasets. However, patch-based methods usually suffer from low computational efficiency, as typically shared activations of adjacent patches are not reused.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%