2018
DOI: 10.32564/108-109.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rendszerváltozás utáni magyar feminista mozgalom globális, történeti perspektívából

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22. Barna et al (2018), discussing the specificities and changes in feminism after the system change in Hungary, single out the 2008 crisis as the emergence of Marxist feminist criticism of the structural consequences of global capitalism for women's life on the periphery of the European Union-though they avoid using Marxism for naming their stance. 23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22. Barna et al (2018), discussing the specificities and changes in feminism after the system change in Hungary, single out the 2008 crisis as the emergence of Marxist feminist criticism of the structural consequences of global capitalism for women's life on the periphery of the European Union-though they avoid using Marxism for naming their stance. 23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Kováts 2017, 116-117;italics added) The excerpt reiterates, without naming, the antagonistically presented choice as emerged in the recent struggles between progressive feminism and transactivism in Hungary. The conflict is summed up from the socalled progressive point of view in Barna et al (2018). 26 This exclusionary fight in Hungary is similar to the English-American so-called TERF war (trans-exclusionary radical feminist)-the parallel is drawn between the two by the Barna et al survey study as well.…”
Section: Progressive Feminist Self-reflexivity and Neoliberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development in this framework is understood as a universal and evolutionary process (Lucas dos Santos and Banerjee 2019: 4). It is argued within this narrative that the success of catching up depends on the cultural specificities of the semi-peripheral countries (Barna et al, 2018). Put differently, such a narrative is built on the symbolic supremacy-or cultural hegemony-of countries at the center of the global economy (the United States or those in Western Europe) and on the expectation that semi-peripheral countries (such as those in the CEE region) need, and are able to catch up with, countries at the center of the global economy (Barna et al, 2018).…”
Section: Peripheralization Political Discontent and Social And Solidarity Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued within this narrative that the success of catching up depends on the cultural specificities of the semi-peripheral countries (Barna et al, 2018). Put differently, such a narrative is built on the symbolic supremacy-or cultural hegemony-of countries at the center of the global economy (the United States or those in Western Europe) and on the expectation that semi-peripheral countries (such as those in the CEE region) need, and are able to catch up with, countries at the center of the global economy (Barna et al, 2018). Catching up is interpreted as the achievement of a moral and aptitudinal similarity, while the lack of catching up is a moral and aptitudinal gap (Böröcz 2006).…”
Section: Peripheralization Political Discontent and Social And Solidarity Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She shows that US mainstream feminism became hegemonic globally through its dominant role in the international Women's Congresses in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. Consequently, in the 1990s a more neoliberalism-conformable agenda was transmitted to feminists on a global scale which ignored the structural and political differences which result from the semiperipheral position of countries in the global accumulation regime (Barna et al, 2018). The dependence on such international donors who promote legal advocacy of women's rights and fighting against discrimination left less space for a more radical, system-critical movement.…”
Section: The Infrastructure Of Political Representation and The Develmentioning
confidence: 99%