2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reliable technique for the induction of locomotor-like activity in the in vitro neonatal rat spinal cord using brainstem electrical stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This flexibility was shown in the present experiments by activating spinal interneuronal systems using different pathways and finding that each of the three different stimulation methods examined here evoked a distinct motor pattern. Although we have not examined this issue systematically, it would not be surprising if the rhythmic patterns evoked by other stimulation methods, such as brain stem stimulation (Zaporozhets et al 2004) or stimulation of different dorsal roots (Marchetti et al 2001) or ventral roots (Mentis et al 2005), would similarly produce patterns distinct from the ones described here. Note that brain stem stimulation evokes a pattern of muscle activations with quadcripes active mainly in extension (Zaporozhets et al 2004), which, depending on which head of quadriceps was recorded from, would make it roughly similar to the CE-evoked patterns seen here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This flexibility was shown in the present experiments by activating spinal interneuronal systems using different pathways and finding that each of the three different stimulation methods examined here evoked a distinct motor pattern. Although we have not examined this issue systematically, it would not be surprising if the rhythmic patterns evoked by other stimulation methods, such as brain stem stimulation (Zaporozhets et al 2004) or stimulation of different dorsal roots (Marchetti et al 2001) or ventral roots (Mentis et al 2005), would similarly produce patterns distinct from the ones described here. Note that brain stem stimulation evokes a pattern of muscle activations with quadcripes active mainly in extension (Zaporozhets et al 2004), which, depending on which head of quadriceps was recorded from, would make it roughly similar to the CE-evoked patterns seen here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In addition to pharmacological activation, there are several other ways to evoke locomotor-like rhythmic patterns in this preparation. In particular, electrical stimulation of inputs to the spinal cord, either by stimulation of dorsal (Marchetti et al 2001) or ventral (Mentis et al 2005) roots, of the cauda equina (CE) (Lev-Tov et al 2000;Strauss and Lev-Tov 2003), or of descending brain stem (Zaporozhets et al 2004) pathways is commonly used to evoke rhythmic patterns. This stimulation is potentially more physiologically interpretable as compared with the bath application of pharmacological agents, relying on the synaptic connectivity of those inputs to spinal interneurons rather than the global activation of neurons by bath-applied agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, blocking synaptic activity in the cervicothoracic cord suppresses lumbar locomotorrelated activity that is otherwise elicited by electrical or chemical brainstem stimulation, thereby indicating the primary involvement of propriospinal synaptic relays in mediating the descending signal transmission (Zaporozhets et al, 2004(Zaporozhets et al, , 2006. Correspondingly, brainstem-evoked activation of the lumbar CPGs is unaffected by the staggered disruption of long ipsilateral bulbospinal projections, but the propagation of locomotory command signals is facilitated by increasing neuronal excitability in the intervening cervicothoracic region (Cowley et al, 2008).…”
Section: Role Of Thoracic Circuitry In Cervicolumbar Cpg Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another set of experiments, the brain stem was stimulated using a suction electrode adhered to the ventrolateral surface (1.5-2.0 Hz, 45-80 pulses, 0.4-to 2.0-mA range). The stimulus electrode was fashioned out of a polyethylene tube (Intramedic PE50, Becton-Dickinson, 500 -600 m tip), and a ground pellet was placed adjacent to the brain stem (Zaporozhets et al 2004). For all stimulation protocols, Ն3 min was allowed between stimulation trains.…”
Section: Activation Of Cpgsmentioning
confidence: 99%