Soon after birth, freely moving quadrupeds can express locomotor activity with coordinated forelimb and hindlimb movements. To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying this coordination, we used an isolated spinal cord preparation from neonatal rats. Under bath-applied 5-HT, N-methyl-D,L-aspartate (NMA), and dopamine (DA), the isolated cord generates fictive locomotion in which homolateral cervicolumbar extensor motor bursts occur in phase opposition, as does bursting in homologous (left-right) extensor motoneurons. This coordination corresponded to a walking gait monitored with EMG recordings in the freely behaving animal. Functional decoupling of the cervical and lumbar generators in vitro by sucrose blockade at the thoracic cord level revealed independent rhythmogenic capabilities with similar cycle frequencies in the two locomotor regions. When the cord was partitioned at different thoracic levels and 5-HT/NMA/DA was applied to the more caudal compartment, the ability of the lumbar generators to drive their cervical counterparts increased with the proportion of chemically exposed thoracic segments. Blockade of synaptic inhibition at the lumbar level caused synchronous bilateral lumbar rhythmicity that, surprisingly, also was able to impose bilaterally synchronous bursting at the unblocked cervical level. Furthermore, after a midsagittal section from spinal segments C1 to T7, and during additional blockade of cervical synaptic inhibition, the cord exposed to 5-HT/NMA/DA continued to produce a coordinated fictive walking pattern similar to that observed in control. Thus, in the newborn rat, a caudorostral propriospinal excitability gradient appears to mediate interlimb coordination, which relies more on asymmetric axial connectivity (both excitatory and inhibitory) between the lumbar and cervical generators than on differences in their inherent rhythmogenic capacities.

Effective quadrupedal locomotion requires a close coordination between the spatially distant central pattern generators (CPGs) controlling forelimb and hindlimb movements. Using isolated preparations of the neonatal rat spinal cord, we explore the role of intervening thoracic circuitry in cervicolumbar CPG coordination and the contribution to this remote coupling of limb somatosensory inputs. In preparations activated with bath-applied N-methyl-D,L-aspartate, serotonin, and dopamine, the coordination between locomotor-related bursts recorded in cervical and lumbar ventral roots was substantially weakened, although not abolished, when the thoracic segments were selectively withheld from neurochemical stimulation or were exposed to a low Ca 2ϩ solution to block synaptic transmission. Moreover, cervicolumbar CPG coordination was reduced after a thoracic midsagittal section, suggesting that cross-cord projections participate in the anteroposterior coupling. In quiescent preparations, either cyclic or tonic electrical stimulation of low-threshold afferent pathways in C8 or L2 dorsal roots (DRs) could elicit coordinated ventral root bursting at both cervical and lumbar levels via an activation of the underlying CPG networks. When lumbar rhythmogenesis was prevented by local synaptic transmission blockade, L2 DR stimulation could still drive left-right alternating cervical bursting in preparations otherwise exposed to normal bathing medium. In contrast, when the cervical generators were selectively blocked, C8 DR stimulation was unable to activate the lumbar CPGs. Thus, in the newborn rat, anteroposterior limb coordination relies on active burst generation within midcord thoracic circuitry that additionally conveys ascending and weaker descending coupling influences of distant limb proprioceptive inputs to the cervical and lumbar generators, respectively.

The temporal properties of limb motoneuron bursting underlying quadrupedal locomotion were investigated in isolated spinal cord preparations (without or with brainstem attached) taken from 0 to 4-day-old rats. When activated either with differing combinations of N -methyl-D,L-aspartate, serotonin and dopamine, or by electrical stimulation of the brainstem, the spinal cord generated episodes of fictive locomotion with a constant phase relationship between cervical and lumbar ventral root bursts. Alternation occurred between ipsi-and contra-lateral flexor and extensor motor root bursts, and the cervical and lumbar locomotor networks were always active in a diagonal coordination pattern that corresponded to fictive walking. However, unlike typical locomotion in adult animals in which extensor motoneuron bursts vary more with cycle period than flexor bursts, in the isolated neonatal cord, an increase in fictive locomotor speed was associated with a decrease in the durations of both extensor and flexor bursts, at cervical and lumbar levels. To determine whether this symmetry in flexor/extensor phase durations derived from the absence of sensory feedback that is normally provided from the limbs during intact animal locomotion, EMG recordings were made from hindlimb-attached spinal cords during drug-induced locomotor-like movements. Under these conditions, the duration of extensor muscle bursts increased with cycle period, while flexor burst durations now tended to remain constant. Moreover, after a complete dorsal rhizotomy, this extensor dominant pattern was replaced by flexor and extensor muscle bursts of similar duration. In vivo and in vitro experiments were also conducted on older postnatal (P10-12) rats at an age when body-supported adult-like locomotion occurs. Here again, characteristic extensor-dominated burst patterns observed during intact treadmill locomotion were replaced by symmetrical patterns during fictive locomotion expressed by the chemically activated isolated spinal cord, further indicating that sensory inputs are normally responsible for imposing extensor biasing on otherwise symmetrically alternating extensor/flexor oscillators.

Locomotion requires the proper sequencing of neural activity to start, maintain, and stop it. Recently, brainstem neurons were shown to specifically stop locomotion in mammals. However, the cellular properties of these neurons and their activity during locomotion are still unknown. Here, we took advantage of the lamprey model to characterize the activity of a cell population that we now show to be involved in stopping locomotion. We find that these neurons display a burst of spikes that coincides with the end of swimming activity. Their pharmacological activation ends ongoing swimming, whereas the inactivation of these neurons dramatically impairs the rapid termination of swimming. These neurons are henceforth referred to as stop cells, because they play a crucial role in the termination of locomotion. Our findings contribute to the fundamental understanding of motor control and provide important details about the cellular mechanisms involved in locomotor termination.

The brainstem locomotor system is believed to be organized serially from the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) to reticulospinal neurons, which in turn, project to locomotor neurons in the spinal cord. In contrast, we now identify in lampreys, brainstem muscarinoceptive neurons receiving parallel inputs from the MLR and projecting back to reticulospinal cells to amplify and extend durations of locomotor output. These cells respond to muscarine with extended periods of excitation, receive direct muscarinic excitation from the MLR, and project glutamatergic excitation to reticulospinal neurons. Targeted block of muscarine receptors over these neurons profoundly reduces MLR-induced excitation of reticulospinal neurons and markedly slows MLR-evoked locomotion. Their presence forces us to rethink the organization of supraspinal locomotor control, to include a sustained feedforward loop that boosts locomotor output.

No abstract

L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) has been successfully used in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) for more than 50 years. It fulfilled the criteria to cross the blood–brain barrier and counteract the biochemical defect of dopamine (DA). It remarkably worked after some adjustments in line with the initial hypothesis, leaving a poor place to the plethora of mechanisms involving other neurotransmitters or mechanisms of action beyond newly synthesized DA itself. Yet, its mechanism of action is far from clear. It involves numerous distinct cell populations and does not mimic the mechanism of action of dopaminergic agonists. L-DOPA-derived DA is mainly released by serotonergic neurons as a false neurotransmitter, and serotonergic neurons are involved in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. The brain pattern and magnitude of DA extracellular levels together with this status of false neurotransmitters suggest that the striatal effects of DA via this mechanism would be minimal. Other metabolic products coming from newly formed DA or through the metabolism of L-DOPA itself could be involved. These compounds can be trace amines and derivatives. They could accumulate within the terminals of the remaining monoaminergic neurons. These “false neurotransmitters,” also known for some of them as inducing an “amphetamine-like” mechanism, could reduce the content of biogenic amines in terminals of monoaminergic neurons, thereby impairing the exocytotic process of monoamines including L-DOPA-induced DA extracellular outflow. The aim of this review is to present the mechanism of action of L-DOPA with a specific attention to “false neurotransmission.”

Locomotion is a basic motor function generated and controlled by genetically defined neuronal networks. The pattern of muscle synergies is generated in the spinal cord, whereas neural centers located above the spinal cord in the brainstem and the forebrain are essential for initiating and controlling locomotor movements. One such locomotor control center in the brainstem is the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR), first discovered in cats and later found in all vertebrate species tested to date. Over the last years, we have investigated the cellular mechanisms by which this locomotor region operates in lampreys. The lamprey MLR is a well-circumscribed region located at the junction between the midbrain and hindbrain. Stimulation of the MLR induces locomotion with an intensity that increases with the stimulation strength. Glutamatergic and cholinergic monosynaptic inputs from the MLR are responsible for excitation of reticulospinal (RS) cells that in turn activate the spinal locomotor networks. The inputs are larger in the rostral than in the caudal hindbrain RS cells. MLR stimulation on one side elicits symmetrical excitatory inputs in RS cells on both sides, and this is linked to bilateral projections of the MLR to RS cells. In addition to its inputs to RS cells, the MLR activates a well-defined group of muscarinoceptive cells in the brainstem that feeds back strong excitation to RS cells in order to amplify the locomotor output. Finally, the MLR gates sensory inputs to the brainstem through a muscarinic mechanism. It appears therefore that the MLR not only controls locomotor activity but also filters sensory influx during locomotion.