Preprints of Papers Presented at the 14th National Meeting of the Association for Computing Machinery on - ACM '59 1959
DOI: 10.1145/612201.612209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reliability field surveillance program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genre coding is an established research methodology in the fields of rhetoric (Grabill & Pigg, 2012; Kane, 2020; Larson et al, 2016; Omizo, Clark et al, 2019; Omizo, Meeks et al, 2021; Propen & Lay Schuster, 2010), writing studies (Madden & Tarabochia, 2021), and English for specific (Flowerdew, 2016) and academic purposes (Chang & Kuo, 2011; Flowerdew, 2000). In BTC, genre coding has been used to study the contrasting feedback given by novice and expert communities (Dannels & Martin, 2008) and English and Chinese call centers (Xu et al, 2010), artifactual analysis of professional writing genres such as multimodal crowdsourced proposals (Feng et al, 2023), content marketing materials such as websites and portfolios (Wall & Spinuzzi, 2018), job rejection letters (Thominet, 2020), science and engineering Kickstarter proposals (Mehlenbacher, 2017), and industry white papers (Campbell & Naidoo, 2017), with the latter three studies adopting what has become known as Swalesean move analysis.…”
Section: Research On Genre Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genre coding is an established research methodology in the fields of rhetoric (Grabill & Pigg, 2012; Kane, 2020; Larson et al, 2016; Omizo, Clark et al, 2019; Omizo, Meeks et al, 2021; Propen & Lay Schuster, 2010), writing studies (Madden & Tarabochia, 2021), and English for specific (Flowerdew, 2016) and academic purposes (Chang & Kuo, 2011; Flowerdew, 2000). In BTC, genre coding has been used to study the contrasting feedback given by novice and expert communities (Dannels & Martin, 2008) and English and Chinese call centers (Xu et al, 2010), artifactual analysis of professional writing genres such as multimodal crowdsourced proposals (Feng et al, 2023), content marketing materials such as websites and portfolios (Wall & Spinuzzi, 2018), job rejection letters (Thominet, 2020), science and engineering Kickstarter proposals (Mehlenbacher, 2017), and industry white papers (Campbell & Naidoo, 2017), with the latter three studies adopting what has become known as Swalesean move analysis.…”
Section: Research On Genre Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%