2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ieem45057.2020.9309970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Relax-and-Solve Algorithm for the Ordered Flow-Shop Scheduling Problem

Abstract: In the ordered flow-shop scheduling problem the processing times follow specific structures. We propose a relax-and-solve matheuristic for the ordered flow-shop problem to minimize the makespan, which is proven to be NPhard. We compare the performance of our method and that of the state-of-the-art methods, and show that the proposed method is capable of reporting new best solutions for a large number of instances, and has the average gap of as low as 0.046% from the best known solutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we propose an R&S matheuristic algorithm for solving problem 1|(aj,Lj,bj)|Cmax$1|(a_j, L_j, b_j)|C_{\max }$. The R&S has been shown to deliver quality solutions for challenging scheduling problems (Ahmadian et al., 2020; Khatami and Salehipour, 2020; Ahmadian and Salehipour, 2021; Ahmadian et al., 2021; Ahmadian and Salehipour, 2022). The operation of the R&S algorithm is similar to that of the fix‐and‐optimize algorithm of Helber and Sahling (2010).…”
Section: The Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we propose an R&S matheuristic algorithm for solving problem 1|(aj,Lj,bj)|Cmax$1|(a_j, L_j, b_j)|C_{\max }$. The R&S has been shown to deliver quality solutions for challenging scheduling problems (Ahmadian et al., 2020; Khatami and Salehipour, 2020; Ahmadian and Salehipour, 2021; Ahmadian et al., 2021; Ahmadian and Salehipour, 2022). The operation of the R&S algorithm is similar to that of the fix‐and‐optimize algorithm of Helber and Sahling (2010).…”
Section: The Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, we evaluate our BDS on a set of benchmarks [28] consisting of 8 sub-datasets, as shown in Table 2. The job numbers range from 100 to 800.…”
Section: Setting Upmentioning
confidence: 99%