2007
DOI: 10.1002/qj.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A regularization approach for a vertical‐slice model and semi‐Lagrangian Störmer–Verlet time stepping

Abstract: ABSTRACT:In this paper, we provide a systematic derivation of regularized equations for a non-hydrostatic and compressible vertical-slice model of the dry atmosphere. The derivation is based on an analysis of a semi-implicit discretization of the equations of motion and a recent regularized formulation is obtained as a special case. An implementation of the regularized equations, using a recent second-order, centred-in-time, two-time-level semi-Lagrangian Störmer-Verlet method, is discussed and a series of num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 1(c) and 2(c)) models both give visually indistinguishable results for both hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic flow regimes. These results are in good agreement with other published results (see, for example, Hundertmark and Reich (2007) and the standard test set documentation). Figure 1(d) shows the result of applying the hydrostatic switch (δ V = 0) in the mass-conserving model to the case of the hydrostatic flow regime.…”
Section: Gravity Wavessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figures 1(c) and 2(c)) models both give visually indistinguishable results for both hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic flow regimes. These results are in good agreement with other published results (see, for example, Hundertmark and Reich (2007) and the standard test set documentation). Figure 1(d) shows the result of applying the hydrostatic switch (δ V = 0) in the mass-conserving model to the case of the hydrostatic flow regime.…”
Section: Gravity Wavessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Skamarock and Klemp (1994) present solutions of a Boussinesq model, for both hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic flow regimes, and find good agreement between numerical and linear analytic solutions. Simulations of the full compressible equation set are presented in Hundertmark and Reich (2007), and also in the standard test documentation (available on the website given above) for the WRF and ARPS models. Whilst there are some differences in the solutions of the compressible equation set, most noticeably in the ARPS results, the overall agreement between models is good.…”
Section: Gravity Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the emergence of nonhydrostatic dynamical cores, this testing framework has been extended to reference simulations with vertical slice models of the proposed three-dimensional model, e.g. Hundertmark and Reich (2007). Thus initial tests proposed for global non-hydrostatic models are typically set for two-dimensional or limited-area domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%