2009
DOI: 10.1002/qj.377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for testing global non‐hydrostatic models

Abstract: ABSTRACT:With the emergence of non-hydrostatic global dynamical cores, an alternative testing strategy is proposed, where the planetary radius is suitably reduced to capture non-hydrostatic phenomena without incurring the computational cost of actual simulations of weather and climate at non-hydrostatic resolution. The procedure is simple and tests various aspects of the discretized hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic equations in the same setting on a sphere. Furthermore, it facilitates verification against Carte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(75 reference statements)
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, there are many factors contributing to parametrization error within the design of the schemes themselves and so our truth forecasts will still be deficient at some level. Ideally, one would wish to have a truth forecast in which deep convection is explicitly represented but that is presently only achievable using the experimental 'small planet' configuration of the IFS [6]. In some respects, the present coarse-graining results could be interpreted as a lower bound on model error mainly associated with horizontal resolution truncation in NWP models.…”
Section: Coarse-graining Results From Ecmwf Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Obviously, there are many factors contributing to parametrization error within the design of the schemes themselves and so our truth forecasts will still be deficient at some level. Ideally, one would wish to have a truth forecast in which deep convection is explicitly represented but that is presently only achievable using the experimental 'small planet' configuration of the IFS [6]. In some respects, the present coarse-graining results could be interpreted as a lower bound on model error mainly associated with horizontal resolution truncation in NWP models.…”
Section: Coarse-graining Results From Ecmwf Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The aspects linked to the Earth's sphericity and rotation are not believed to have a specific impact on non-hydrostatic motion and therefore are not mentioned in the model description. It should finally be noted that the formulation of the EE system described here has also been jointly implemented (with ECMWF) in the global model IFS/ARPEGE for stretched and unstretched spherical geometries (Wedi and Smolarkiewicz, 2009), but this also is not further developed here, mainly because global NWP modelling does not currently allow resolutions fine enough for NH effects to become clearly beneficial. A version of the NH dynamical kernel for a 'deep atmosphere' has been implemented for both the global and limited-area versions of the dynamical kernel following Wood and Staniforth (2003), but for simplicity it is not used or documented here.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IFS, UM, GSM, GFS. SISL-based schemes guarantee boundedness of the solution and unconditional stability [96], which have the advantagecompared to explicit schemes-that they permit a relatively large time-step and a very competitive time-to-solution performance [24,73,105,111,114].…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%