C[CpRu(CO)] is only one transition-metal fullerene complex with pure η-coordinated bonds, which was recently synthesized through the reaction between dinuclear Ru complex [CpRu(CO)] and C. Though new properties can be expected in the η-coordinated metal-fullerene complex, its characteristic features are unclear, and the [2 + 2]-type formation reaction is very slow with a very small yield. A density functional theory study discloses that the η-coordinated bond is formed by a large overlap between the Ru d orbital and C p one involved in the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) (π*) of C unlike the well-known η-coordinated metal-fullerene complex which has a π-type coordinate bond with metal d orbital. The binding energy per one Ru-C bond is much smaller than those of η-coordinated Pt(PMe)(C) and IrH(CO)(PH)(C) because the Ru d orbital exists at low energy. The formation reaction occurs via Ru-Ru bond cleavage on the C surface followed by a direction change of CpRu(CO) to afford C[CpRu(CO)] in a stepwise manner via two asymmetrical transition states to avoid a symmetry-forbidden character. The calculated Gibbs activation energy (ΔG°) is very large and the Gibbs reaction energy (ΔG°) is moderately negative, which are consistent with a very slow reaction rate and very small yield. The charge transfer from CpRu(CO) to fullerene CT(Ru → C) is important in the reaction, but it is small due to the presence of the Ru d orbital at low energy, which is the reason for the large ΔG° and moderately negative ΔG°. The use of Li@C is theoretically predicted to accelerate the reaction and increase the yield of Li@C[CpRu(CO)], because the CT(Ru → C) is enhanced by the low energy LUMO of Li@C. It is also predicted that Li@C[Re(CO)(PMe)] is a next promising target for the synthesis of the η-coordinated metal-fullerene complex, but syntheses of C[Co(CO)], C[Re(CO)], Li@C[Co(CO)], and Li@C[Re(CO)] are difficult. The use of nonpolar solvent is another important factor for the synthesis of the η-coordinated metal complex with Li@C.