A mixed-ligand metal-metal bonded diruthenium complex having the formula Ru(2)(2,4,6-(CH(3))(3)ap)(3)(O(2)CCH(3))Cl where ap is the anilinopyridinate anion was synthesized from the reaction of Ru(2)(O(2)CCH(3))(4)Cl and H(2,4,6-(CH(3))(3)ap), after which the isolated product was structurally, spectroscopically and electrochemically characterized. The crystal structure reveals an unusual arrangement of the bridging ligands around the dimetal unit where one ruthenium atom is coordinated to one anilino and two pyridyl nitrogen atoms while the other ruthenium atom is coordinated to one pyridyl and two anilino nitrogen atoms. To our knowledge, Ru(2)(2,4,6-(CH(3))(3)ap)(3)(O(2)CCH(3))Cl is the only example of a mixed-ligand diruthenium complex of the type [Ru(2)L(3)(O(2)CCH(3))](+), where L is an unsymmetrical anionic bridging ligand that has been structurally characterized with a "(2,1)" geometric conformation of the bridging ligands, all others being "(3,0)". The initial Ru(2)(5+) compound in CH(2)Cl(2) or CH(3)CN containing 0.1 M tetra-n-butylammonium perchlorate (TBAP) undergoes up to four one-electron redox processes involving the dimetal unit. The Ru(2)(5+/4+) and Ru(2)(5+/6+) processes were characterized under N(2) using thin-layer UV-visible spectroelectrochemistry and this data is compared to UV-visible spectral changes obtained during similar electrode reactions for related diruthenium compounds having the formula Ru(2)L(4)Cl or Ru(2)L(3)(O(2)CCH(3))Cl where L is an anionic bridging ligand. Ru(2)(2,4,6-(CH(3))(3)ap)(3)(O(2)CCH(3))Cl was also examined by UV-visible and FTIR spectroelectrochemistry under a CO atmosphere and two singly reduced Ru(2)(4+) species, [Ru(2)(2,4,6-(CH(3))(3)ap)(3)(O(2)CCH(3))(CO)Cl](-) and Ru(2)(2,4,6-(CH(3))(3)ap)(3)(O(2)CCH(3))(CO) were in situ generated for further characterization. The CO-bound complexes could be further reduced and exhibited additional reductions to their Ru(2)(3+) and Ru(2)(2+) oxidation states.

No abstract

Three related diruthenium complexes containing four symmetrical anionic bridging ligands were synthesized and characterized as to their electrochemical and spectroscopic properties. The examined compounds are represented as Ru2(dpb)4Cl, Ru2(dpb)4(CO), and Ru2(dpb)4(NO) in the solid state, where dpb = diphenylbenzamidinate anion. Different forms of Ru2(dpb)4Cl are observed in solution depending on the utilized solvent and the counteranion added to solution. Each Ru2(5+) form of the compound undergoes multiple redox processes involving the dimetal unit. The reversibility as well as potentials of these diruthenium-centered electrode reactions depends upon the solvent and the bound axial ligand. The Ru2(5+/4+) and Ru2(5+/6+) processes of Ru2(dpb)4Cl were monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy in both CH2Cl2 and PhCN. A conversion of Ru2(dpb)4Cl to [Ru2(dpb)4(CO)](+) was also carried out by simply bubbling CO gas through a CH2Cl2 solution of Ru2(dpb)4Cl at room temperature. The chemically generated [Ru2(dpb)4(CO)](+) complex undergoes several electron transfer processes in CH2Cl2 containing 0.1 M TBAClO4 under a CO atmosphere, and the same reactions were seen for a chemically synthesized sample of Ru2(dpf)4(CO) in CH2Cl2, 0.1 M TBAClO4 under a N2 atmosphere, where dpf = N,N'-diphenylformamidinate anion. Ru2(dpb)4(NO) undergoes two successive one-electron reductions and a single one-electron oxidation, all of which involve the diruthenium unit. The CO and NO adducts of Ru2(dpb)4 were further characterized by FTIR spectroelectrochemistry, and the IR spectral data of these compounds are discussed in light of results for previously characterized Ru2(dpf)4(CO) and Ru2(dpf)4(NO) derivatives under similar solution conditions.

No abstract

The electrosynthesis of Rh(2)(dpf)(4)(R) where dpf is the N,N'-diphenylformamidinate anion and R = CH(3), C(2)H(5), C(3)H(7), C(4)H(9) or C(5)H(11) was carried out in THF containing 0.2 M tetra-n-butylammonium perchlorate (TBAP) and one of several alkyl iodides represented as RI. The initial step in the reaction involved a one-electron reduction of the Rh(2)(4+) unit in Rh(2)(dpf)(4) to its Rh(2)(3+) form followed by a homogeneous reaction involving electrogenerated [Rh(2)(dpf)(4)](-) and the alkyl iodide in solution to give Rh(2)(dpf)(4)(R). The homogeneously generated Rh(2)(5+) product was then immediately reduced by a second electron at the potential where [Rh(2)(dpf)(4)(R)](-) is generated, giving [Rh(2)(dpf)(4)(R)](-) which contains a Rh(2)(4+) center as a final product of an electrochemical ECE mechanism. The electrosynthesized [Rh(2)(dpf)(4)(CH(3))](-) derivative could be reoxidized to Rh(2)(dpf)(4)(CH(3)) on the reverse potential sweep and both forms of the CH(3) bonded derivative were in situ characterized by cyclic voltammetry combined with UV-visible and/or ESR spectroscopy. The reversible Rh(2)(4+/3+) process of Rh(2)(dpf)(4) is located at E(1/2) = -1.11 V in THF, 0.2 M TBAP while the electrogenerated Rh(2)(dpf)(4)(R) products are substantially easier to reduce, with E(p) values for the Rh(2)(5+/4+) couples ranging from -0.50 to -0.54 V vs. SCE depending upon the specific R group.

No abstract

Classical hydroformylation catalysts use mononuclear rhodium(I) complexes as precursors; however, very few examples of bimetallic systems have been reported. Herein, we report fully substituted dirhodium(II,II) complexes (C1−C6) containing acetate and diphenylformamidinate bridging ligands (L1−L4). The structure and geometry around these paddlewheeltype, bimetallic cores were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The complexes C3−C6 show electrochemical redox reactions, with the expected reduction (Rh 2 4+/3+ ) and two oxidation (Rh 2 4+/5+ and Rh 2 5+/6+ ) electron transfer processes. Furthermore, the bimetallic complexes were evaluated as catalyst precursors for the hydroformylation of 1-octene, with the acetate-containing complexes (C1 and C2) showing near quantitative conversion (>99%) of 1-octene, excellent activity and chemoselectivity toward aldehydes (>98%), with moderate regioselectivity toward linear products. Replacement of the acetate with diphenylformamidinate ligands (complexes C3−C6) yielded moderate-togood chemoselectivity and regioselectivity, favoring linear aldehydes.

Treatment of the known half-sandwich complexes of the type [(η 6-C 6 H 6)RuCl 2 (P(OR) 3)] (R = Me or Ph) with SnCl 2 yielded three new half-sandwich ruthenium complexes (C1-C3): [(η 6-C 6 H 6)RuCl(SnCl 3)(P(OMe) 3)] (C1), [(η 6-C 6 H 6)RuCl(SnCl 3)(P(OPh) 3)] (C2) and the bis-stannyl complex [(η 6-C 6 H 6)Ru(SnCl 3) 2 (P(OMe) 3)] (C3) by facile insertion of SnCl 2 into the Ru-Cl bonds. Treatment of the known complexes [(η 6-C 6 H 6)RuCl(SnCl 3)(PPh 3)] and [(η 6-C 6 H 6)RuCl 2 (PPh 3)] with 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DAMP) and ammonium tetrafluoroborate afforded the complex salts: [(η 6-C 6 H 6)Ru(SnCl 3)(PPh 3)(DAMP)] + BF 4 − (C4) and [(η 6-C 6 H 6)RuCl(PPh 3)(DAMP)] + BF 4 − (C5) respectively. Complexes C1-C5 have been fully characterized by spectroscopic means (IR, UV-vis, multinuclear NMR, ESI-MS) and their thermal behaviour elucidated by thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA). Structural characterization by single crystal X-ray crystallography of the novel complex C2 and [(η 6-C 6 H 6)RuCl 2 (P(OPh) 3)], the latter having escaped elucidation by this method, is also reported. Finally, the cytotoxicity of the complexes was determined on the A2780 (human ovarian cancer), A2780cisR (human ovarian cis-platin-resistant cancer), and the HEK293 (human embryonic kidney) cell lines and discussed, and an attempt is made to elucidate the effect of the stannyl ligand on cytotoxicity.