2000
DOI: 10.1080/00102200008952121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rectilinear Droplet Stream in Combustion: Droplet and Gas Phase Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Important parameters such as the distance between the droplets are modified in order to characterize their influence on the droplet evaporation. Monodisperse droplet streams have been used in previous studies of droplet evaporation (Castanet et al 2005(Castanet et al , 2011Deprédurand et al 2010;Virepinte et al 2000). These studies emphasized the role of the dimensionless spacing parameter C, defined as the ratio between the droplet spacing L and the droplet size d. For low values of C, the heating and evaporation rates are reduced in comparison with the isolated droplet whose evolution can be predicted using classical models (Abramzon and Sirignano 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important parameters such as the distance between the droplets are modified in order to characterize their influence on the droplet evaporation. Monodisperse droplet streams have been used in previous studies of droplet evaporation (Castanet et al 2005(Castanet et al , 2011Deprédurand et al 2010;Virepinte et al 2000). These studies emphasized the role of the dimensionless spacing parameter C, defined as the ratio between the droplet spacing L and the droplet size d. For low values of C, the heating and evaporation rates are reduced in comparison with the isolated droplet whose evolution can be predicted using classical models (Abramzon and Sirignano 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The horizontal PLIF profiles at y=3 mm displayed in Figure 8 show that the PLIF intensities are significantly lower for the reacting condition than for the corresponding non-reacting case. This is expected for two reasons: First, CARS measurements for reacting monodisperse droplet chains showed that gas temperatures on the centerline are typically in the range of 1200-2000 K [1][2][3], which implies a strongly reduced gas density and thereby a reduced volumetric vapor concentration. Secondly, the fluorescence quantum yield of acetone for excitation at λ=266 nm is significantly reduced for temperatures larger than, say, 600 K [14].…”
Section: Results For Reacting Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is apparently caused by the intense heat transfer from the flame front at r=1.5 mm to the droplets at r=0 mm. As a rough estimate, the CARS measurements for a reacting chain of monodisperse ethanol droplets by Virepinte et al [3] showed that the gas temperature reaches a maximum of 2000 K at the flame front at r=1.5 mm and reduces to 1300-1500 K at the centerline, which corresponds to a substantial temperature gradient of 330-470 K per mm driving the fuel vaporization. …”
Section: Results For Reacting Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…between the instants t =5.3 ms and t =9.6 ms, where t =0 was taken at the injector exit. The droplet diameter reduction because of evaporation was evaluated between t =5.3 ms and t =9.6 ms, with the help of the experimental results of Virepinte et al (2000) obtained in a similar situation. This diameter reduction was less than 5 lm and was therefore neglected in the data reduction process, since the uncertainties linked to the positioning of the measurement points caused by the random motions of the droplet were of the same order of magnitude.…”
Section: Experimental Results In Combustionmentioning
confidence: 99%