1984
DOI: 10.1080/0311213840120201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reconsideration of the Practicum as the Critical Element of Teacher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results of research on student teaching have been inconclusive and often contradictory (Hull and Baker, 1984;Hersh, Hull and Leighton, 1982) it is apparent that there are elements within student teaching which loom as being important for the development of the student teacher. Some research studies isolate factors considered to be important; for example, the changes in attitudes of the student teacher which can be attributed to student teaching experiences, the value of the relationships between the co-operating teacher and student teacher, the impact of the university supervisor, the quality of the supervision and consequent feedback provided to the student teacher and the effect of the co-operating teacher as a model (Hull, Baker, Kyle and Goad, 1983).…”
Section: Student Teaching and The Wait Experiencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although the results of research on student teaching have been inconclusive and often contradictory (Hull and Baker, 1984;Hersh, Hull and Leighton, 1982) it is apparent that there are elements within student teaching which loom as being important for the development of the student teacher. Some research studies isolate factors considered to be important; for example, the changes in attitudes of the student teacher which can be attributed to student teaching experiences, the value of the relationships between the co-operating teacher and student teacher, the impact of the university supervisor, the quality of the supervision and consequent feedback provided to the student teacher and the effect of the co-operating teacher as a model (Hull, Baker, Kyle and Goad, 1983).…”
Section: Student Teaching and The Wait Experiencementioning
confidence: 96%