2021
DOI: 10.1002/ca.23802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reappraisal of pediatric abdominal surface anatomy

Abstract: Surface anatomy is fundamental to clinical and surgical practices. As the surface anatomy varies with age, the purpose of this study is to provide age-standardized surface markings for the abdomen in children. A total of 155 abdominal computed tomography scans of healthy children aged 0-18 years were categorized into six groups, and the surface anatomy of the major vascular structures, solid viscera, and anatomical planes in the abdomen was analyzed. The vertebral levels of the celiac trunk, superior mesenteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many recent studies primarily re‐evaluate the surface anatomies of both adult and pediatric populations in vivo using CT (Açar et al, 2021; Fischer et al, 2017; Keough et al, 2016; Mirjalili, Hale, Buckenham, Wilson, & Stringer, 2012; Mirjalili, McFadden, Buckenham, & Stringer, 2012; Mirjalili, McFadden, Buckenham, Wilson, & Stringer, 2012; Nadesan et al, 2019; Şener et al, 2022; Shen et al, 2016; Subramaniam et al, 2016; Tarr et al, 2016; Uzun et al, 2016). These studies emphasized age‐related differences in surface anatomies in both populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent studies primarily re‐evaluate the surface anatomies of both adult and pediatric populations in vivo using CT (Açar et al, 2021; Fischer et al, 2017; Keough et al, 2016; Mirjalili, Hale, Buckenham, Wilson, & Stringer, 2012; Mirjalili, McFadden, Buckenham, & Stringer, 2012; Mirjalili, McFadden, Buckenham, Wilson, & Stringer, 2012; Nadesan et al, 2019; Şener et al, 2022; Shen et al, 2016; Subramaniam et al, 2016; Tarr et al, 2016; Uzun et al, 2016). These studies emphasized age‐related differences in surface anatomies in both populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%