A realist approach to science and practice in psychology

Abstract

The possibility of uniting science and practice in psychology is considered. The main aim is to explore the ability of a realist approach to address the various dichotomies prevalent in psychology. The multileveled demands of the society, government, and tertiary training are briefly discussed. The multitude of mental health needs in South African society is addressed by government with a number of policies and legislative processes. In addition, training of psychologists is under pressure because of the changing demands within higher education institutions. The pressure to function as research institutions necessitates a revisioning of the scientist-practitioner model. This model perpetuates bipolarity because of a scientistic understanding of what it means to be scientific. This article describes a realist model of science that avoids some of the more serious dichotomies so prevalent in South African psychology departments, namely, the quantitative-qualitative divide, the positivist-constructionist split, and possibly also the scientist-practitioner model. A realist image of science might achieve this integration because of the simple fact that both science and practice involve critical enquiry. Two examples of a realist psychology from neuropsychology are discussed. Keywords Constructionist, critical enquiry, quantitative-qualitative, realism, scientist-practitioner modelThis article discusses the implications for relooking the scientist-practitioner (SP) model. First, the multileveled demands of society, government, and training are briefly discussed. It is shown that South African society is drenched in a multitude of mental health needs, which the government wants to address by a number of policies and legislative processes. Training of psychologists is under pressure because of the changing higher education landscape. The pressure to function as research institutions moves the reappraisal of the SP model to the top of the agenda. The bipolarity

The value of measurement for development of nursing knowledge: Underlying philosophy, contributions and critiques

“…Lektorskii (2010) describes three levels of reality in constructive realism including: ( Constructive realism assumes that observers can get "near to the truth" in measurement through direct and indirect observations (Cupchik, 2001). A person's outward, observable behaviours reflect their unobservable, constructed reality (i.e., psychological constructs) (Michie, Johnston, Francis, Hardeman, & Eccles, 2008;Maree, 2014;Streiner, Norman, & Cairney, 2015;Walsh et al, 2014). Like positivism, constructive realism supports data collection through measurement, and allocates numerical values to objective properties or constructs using a reductionist approach.…”

<i>South African Journal of Industrial Psychology</i>: Annual editorial review 2016

“…The literature review section of manuscripts is essential in providing a summary of primary research in the relevant subject matter and is a means for keeping abreast of organisational phenomena and problems that need further research (critical inquiry) in a particular context. The research method (either quantitative, qualitative, blended or multiple) is a process that assists positivistic-realistic critical inquiry; the appropriateness of a specific method is empirically determined via sensitivity to the subject matter under investigation (Maree, 2015;Petocz, 2011). As an applied science, I/O psychology research should inform practice, that is, bring new impetus to our understanding of the complexities embedded in psychosocial behaviour and problematic organisational phenomena in the contemporary and emerging future workplace.…”